A conversation with A.G. Lafley

with A.G. Lafley
in Business
on Wednesday, April 23, 2008 * * * * *

play

E-mail this video:

Distribute this video:

Share on:

Close
Description

A conversation with A.G. Lafley, Chairman and CEO, Procter & Gamble.

Video Share Options
Share
Buy Amazon DVD
Keywords:
A.G.
household
tide
innovation
Procter & Gamble
CEO
clean
tech

In order to download Charlie Rose podcasts to iTunes for transfer to an iPod, you must have iTunes installed. If you do, please click the following link to download the podcast for this interview:

itpc://www.charlierose.com/view/itunes/9053

Otherwise, close this window to continue viewing.

Close
  • Comments 15
    Post new comment
    1. Stephen  05/18/2008 11:04 PM Report

      P&G is one of the most environmentally active and sensative companies on the planet. They need to do more, but I know from my dealings with them that it is a very high priority. I will tell you that they are very very impressive.

    2. Theresa Prado  05/05/2008 12:58 PM Report

      A.G. Lafley came across as such a nice well spoken man. What a pity he is not more environmentally conscious. To me what is absolutely vital and cannot be compromised any longer is a healthy planet. A system that can be made to function in balance with nature and that every product (and the materials they are contained in) be made non-toxic, biodegradable, all-natural and organic. And that the government release all suppressed clean energy technologies of course!

    3. Robert  05/02/2008 09:51 AM Report

      Funny---All through the interview, Mr. Lafley was commenting on 'working with innovators'---so I emailed the company through their website stating that I had a well thought out 'idea' that would save them money and make some their products more convenient for the customers. I told them that I don't believe the 'idea' was 'patentable', but it is still a good innovation.

      Guess what--I got an email back from someone at their "Connect & Develop Review Team" that unless my idea was 'patentable'--they WEREN'T interested!!

      Direct quote:

      "Unfortunately we do not accept ideas for review."

      So, Mr. Lafley, even though you may 'state' that your company wants to 'partner' with its customers, apparently, your employees don't.

    4. Mark  04/30/2008 05:17 PM Report

      Doesn't anyone take notice and think, when a CEO like Lafley speaks about the P&G culture which seeks workers to put in 60, 70, and 80 hours a week? Sounds like a great quality of life organization.

    5. MarieR  04/25/2008 11:13 PM Report

      UTAH?

    6. Jean-Leon Bouchenoire  04/25/2008 06:47 AM Report

      I am trying to get AG Lafley's interview on dvd, But it seems impossible. First I get German language and then I can watch it again live. But this is not what I want. Can you help? Amazon is no help either.

    7. Wendy  04/25/2008 12:02 AM Report

      Why is it that when you go to buy the video the language is in German?

    8. Nonni   04/24/2008 07:00 PM Report

      Charlie -- not one question about the eco responsibility of corporations when it comes to ''innovating'' toxic chemicals, manufacturing's carbon footprint or disposable diapers that don't decompose ever! Why not?

    9. Giselle Massi  04/24/2008 09:59 AM Report

      When asked by Charlie why P&G chose Utah for the new manufacturing plant, Mr. Lafley didn't mention to Charlie that the financial incentives (tax incentives) the state of Utah acknowledges it gave to P&G for locating the manufacturing plant. Those amount to about $85 million.

    10. don wonnell  04/24/2008 09:43 AM Report

      Heard most of the conversation with A. G. Lafley. His comment hit home, if I quote him right, that the most important area of economic development is the workforce. He also outlined what economic development looks for in a workforce - skill levels, completers, well trained people, etc.

      He asks customers what they want. Gets back to what someone said "if you can't help me with a problem, what good are you to me?" The reverse is true also. He strikes me as primarily a big issues supervisor, which seems to succeed.

      Companies aren't in business to create jobs - jobs are the product of a company that is successful.

      Americans say the economy, and within that jobs, are one of the 2 or 3 major issues now. Lafley's points about the workforce are central to improving the economy.

    11. G.M.G.  04/24/2008 09:09 AM Report

      Charlie you whimped out !! I didnâ??t hear the conversation about P&Gâ??s environmental role in the world, change, and real leadership, instead of just pacification. I watched and realized you were not an active member in the conversation . There is forgiveness, but keep trying,â?¦â?¦ and Thank You G.M.G

    12. Deena Stein  04/24/2008 03:37 AM Report

      Very much enjoyed watching interview with Mr. Lafley, regardless of P&G, another large corporation. His ideas about leadership were very inspirational and reminded me of listening to a quieter version of Tom Peters, management guru. Then I went to Wikipedia to look up Mr. Lafley and found that we share exact birthdays!

    13. Erin Ressler  04/24/2008 02:45 AM Report

      Re innovation: Curious if Mr. Lafley or his staff have ever worked with Paul Plsek? Incredibly masterful instructor & facilitator of innovation techniques. His approach & tools are trademarked under 'Directed Creativity.' Powerful in terms of harnessing power of front lines; have studied under him in combination with using kaizen across the organization for waste reduction and streamlining. Thanks.

    14. eco-shopper  04/24/2008 12:42 AM Report

      P&G is too pricey on balance. A culture of economical products for hard times would be a patriotism for a nation entering recession. Slimmer margins, more volume.

    15. RE Mant  04/23/2008 11:55 PM Report

      I don't know about innovation, but since P&G products nose-dived a few years ago for what seemed to me to be entirely a matter of consumer boredom, they have flooded the market with more slightly different variations on basically the same thing: different smell, color, etc., what professionals call product differentiation. P&G has always used something of this sort as a strategy, so that their products under different names take up more shelf-space than anyone else's. It seems to me that they have yet to make up the ground they lost, but I sure don't buy $5/tube toothpaste nor the smell of Tide anymore.