Charlie Rose

Irish   04/13/2008 05:03 PM Report

yeah, the Obama speaking behind the scenes in San Fran and stereotyping half the country must be savvy - I am sure I will get it - right after a rather large looneytunes safe falls on my head.

Carol J  04/09/2008 12:12 PM Report

To the response Carol J and to the response to Irish: This sounds like a lecture and either Charlie Rose or one of his staff wrote them. I am tired of hearing praise for Barack Obama and bad mouthing Hillary Clinton. We long time voters would rather they continue talking about the issues and not have the media constantly re-hashing what was said by their individual staff members or what their ministers have said. Bill Clinton can also shut his mouth.

Response to Carol J  04/08/2008 11:08 PM Report

Carol J: I disagree with having all the 50+ states primaries at the same day. We will not have clear winners that way, there will be diverse outcome. Meaning many of the runners are going to have closely similar outcomes, then what??? That is a bad idea, because democracy will not be served well. That way we may not end with the best-qualified candidate. The current system in place is excellent. It is better to filter those with leadership skills and those withwout leadership skills and those in between (pretend to have leadership skills but deep down they are followers). We have to be able to test our candidate on a stage where the pressure is immense and have them debate with each other on record, ideas as well as intentions. First and foremost the Democratic Party has to prove to all ctizens that it is a Party of the people by going to all minority communities and make them feel they too are just as important to make up our nation. The Democractic Party has done that well, unlike the Republican Party umbrella reserved to shelter the few; the Democratic Party has a bigger umbrella that shelter all.

Response to Irish  04/08/2008 10:50 PM Report

Irish: You must have misunderstood the issue was about comfort. It is true elderly folks have lived longer, let's not forget it was only some 43 years earlier African-Americans were allowed to vote. Those elderly folks were in the middle of it all the partial democracy America was pushing for. America only became a full-fledged democracy in 1965, prior to that year America was not practicing democratic principles. Hence, that is the only logical explanation one can come to, with respect to majority of elderly folks not going to the best qualified presidential contender, Sen. Brack Obama! As you can see, many of the younger generation is going for Obama, they recognized his qualification and savvyness and embraced him fully. Regardless of his background, they only care how smart, capable and intelligent he is ad also saw the desecration of the oval-office by the current administration, and wanted to save America from utter failure by choosing the best hope for the country and the world. I am not saying it for the sake of writing something, it is happening before our eyes. If you have problem seeing that, I recommend you to speak to a neutral political pundit and confirm. You don't have to get mad, just be glad, we are about to go through leadership overhauling of the way America is governed. For the new century, new way of thinking coming to the White House!

Carol J  04/06/2008 07:16 PM Report

To Shaft: First of all, I must correct my phrasing of my previous comments. I meant to say all 50 states should have their primaries on the same day. Then have the general where we all vote on the same day except for absentee ballots. Now Shaft you sound like a moron. Hillary does not need to stop her campaigning and she does not need to take an extended vacation to Guam. You should go someplace where it is 40 below zero and open the window and stick your head out of it and freeze off your snooty nose.

Irish  04/06/2008 06:25 PM Report

Shaft - on the thread for Axelrod's visit you said elderly people wont vote for your candidate because they are racist. This shows you to be a very limited person and not worth my time. Open a window and let some fresh air in - you stink of hate.

Shaft  04/03/2008 04:59 PM Report

Answer to Carol J, Irish, and Frank BK: The issue here is time, and we do not have a lot of. The math clearly reveals that no matter how much Sen. Hillary Clinton wins by in the State of Pennsylvania; she cannot reach Sen. Barack Obama's numbers. He has almost 800,000 more voice capital, nearly twice as much States and over 130 more delegates over his competitor. If Sen. Clinton were to win all the coming States by 60:40 she would still be behind Sen. Barack Obama's numbers. What is the point of staying in? If the numbers are not there, then its better to prepare the path for concession speech: thank all those who volunteered their valuable time and invested their emotion, contributed with money and all sorts of supports, and most importantly she should tell all her support to rally behind our nominee. She should wish him an easy victory over Sen. McCain (who happens to be Pres. GWB's policy twin) and take a week or two rest from all this hectic period she has been thru for the past year and half, take an extended vacation to heal the concussions sustained over the last four months and move on. I heard the island of Guam is the best destination this time of the year. The longer she stays in the race will only make her appear to be vindictive and looking to draw more blood. We all know that Sen. Clinton is above that and more, she is one of thee most politically matured Senator of our times, her service in the Senate is highly valuable and appreciated. Next to Sen. Obama she has a far reaching understanding of which path our society should be heading. In short, she is needed more in the Senate than anywhere. It is about time for Sen. Barack Obama to re-arrange his angles and point his cannon vectors toward Sen. McCain where it hurts most, his Iraq policy and inability of understanding the inner workings of the economy. America is ill and needs a healer, and we've got the best political doctor. The doc is on his way,and that doc is Sen. Barack Obama! The faster we rally behind our candidate the faster hope will spread to those who need it, so the healing process begins. Let's not give Sen. McCain all the time to go around the country and make a mockery of America by flaunting GWB's failed policies, let's not allow him to take advantage of the infighting within the Democratic Party. All those States that went for Sen. Hillary Clinton will be talked into the program of change, so we can all stand together and bring about the desired effect to change America first and the world at large.

Frustrated Democrat  04/01/2008 07:49 AM Report

Voters should be aware that the Clintonâ??s are named defendants in a Civil Fraud Case connected to Campaign Finance irregularities and have not disclosed the appeal.

There will be a trial date set at a hearing on April 25th, just 3 days after the key Pennsylvania Primary for the Fraud Case Paul v. Clinton in the Los Angeles Superior Court. Plaintiff says he will call Gov Rendell as witness in the case.

From what I understand, this case began when prior to Sen. Clintonâ??s 2000 New York Senate campaign and also raised donations for Pres. Clintonâ??s Library. Plaintiff claims that the appeal was granted based on introduction of new videotaped evidence that contradicts Senator Clintonâ??s signed Declaration and previous testimony. The Department of Justice had been holding the tapes and they were just released them to him last year when the appeal was filed.

Allegedly, there was some cat and mouse played with process service. This resulted in an admonition by Judge Aurelio Munzo stating that he didnâ??t care if the Clintonâ??s (Pres & Senator Clinton and Chelsea) were served on the campaign trail. I am not sure if one of the other main defendants, James Levin, has been served yet, he was former business partner to Pres Clinton and former Library Board Member (removed since his Federal conviction of defrauding the Chicago Public Schools of money). Mr. Levin is on Federal Parole and Plaintiff alleges that he is reporting as required, but no assistance from Parole office was being provided to serve him to appear in California courts. As I type this is seems just ridiculous that we as voters have not heard a news stories about it since the appeal was granted. Bloggers however are discussing and following the case. Someone said the trial date was going to be set in November. That is one problem that results from the information being shared on blogs instead of investigated by the professional media. THE GOP knows about it for sure.

We donâ??t know the Clintonâ??s side of the story because they have not disclosed this. But Peter Paul tells his side of the story on Video. And yes, it is being viewed on the Internet. You can click on any of the hyperlinks below to view the videos or to get to the court documents.

Just Google: â??Hillary Uncensoredâ??

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7007109937779036019

At first I could not believe it, so I found the website for the Court and did a search of their database. I still couldnâ??t believe it and called and spoke to the Clerk. Itâ??s a real case!!!

Los Angeles Superior Court of Appeals: http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org

Then click on Civil Case Summaries and enter case number to see case history.

Case Number: BC304174

Los Angeles Superior Court Public Information Office (213) 974-5227.

As of about a week ago this Office got so many calls, that they have set up voicemail for callers to leave their name and number for a return call.

I also found an email form to contact the court via email:

http://pview.findlaw.com/cmd/profileview?xsl=/xsl/lawyer_emailform.xsl&wld_id=1400616_2&which=email_a ddr:1

You will need to use a credit card to pay for access to the court documents online.

The GOP has utilized the services of a 527 called â??Citizenâ??s Unitedâ?? (www.citizensunited.org) to produce a 90 Minute Movie for the public to defeat Senator Clinton in the Fall if she wins the nomination. This group begins the film with her very first week in the White House and Travel Gate, then they begin with Pres. Clinton pardoning of 11 of 14 FALN Terrorist Members (responsible for bombing Frances Tavern in Manhattan in 1975 who had not even applied for pardons) prior to her Senate victory, and Sen. Clinton winning overwhelmingly the Puerto Rican vote in New York.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton_pardons_controversy

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/09/08/congress.faln/

http://online.wsj.com/public/article_print/SB120277819085260827.html

Then they cover this current fraud case. They use the current case as one of many reasons she should not be President. The US Supreme Court recently (last week) ruled that the 527 must release its donor list before they begin showing if for a fee in theatres. They are of course appealing the decision.

This is the 90 Minute Movie that the Citizens United has created for the GOP to defeat Senator Clinton. Aside from the horrible war in Iraq, the economy, in contrast, Senator McCain seems to be an honorable and trustworthy man.

1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_PEHskBuQg

2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5_SfPvtY-s

3) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rog6WBL7jog

4) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqlYlTxnUdE

5) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9hXf5yckbY

6) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKftVPA85jI

7) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCQOgTKtNhA

8) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRHPrjf4h6g

9) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lm-5MrOrqPE

Another Bush-type prevaricator  03/31/2008 10:08 PM Report

Hillary's fantasia 'hail-of-fire' in Bosnia was totally pathological bordering on Bush's WMD's, yellow-cake, Mission Accomplished ad nauseum. Want more? 3P - Pathological, Pathetic and Pitiful. -P Not presidential. Both Hill/Bill astute as hell without an ounce of wisdom. And so blase' - "OK, I miss-spoke." Like get over it, cause it comes so natural to me it wont be the last time. Depends on what the definition of is is. Remember?

good idea!  03/31/2008 09:32 PM Report

hey Holly - you are right! Dump the old - they dont know squat. So I am going to dump you first. Bye!

holly  03/31/2008 09:16 PM Report

Bk...I simply do not understand the female anger at Barack Obama, who has said repeatedly in print and public, that he owes everything to his mother and grandparents. He has not called for Hillary to drop out; but honestly, I wouldn't mind if he called for Bill to drop out. Beats me how women forgive women who stick by cads in order to claim "experience" when THEY decide to run for public office, but don't look at the solid marriage Barack shares with his wife..who built a career before marrying Barack, WITHOUT HIS NAME OR HELP. Ladies, Michelle is the model, not Hillary. How can any woman forgive Hillary's vote on the invasion of Iraq, or McCain's for that matter?

Some pooh-pooh Barack's stand against that war, saying that he wasn't in the senate at the time. True, BUT he was RUNNING FOR THE SENATE at the time! Judgement, courage, character on the MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE of the past 45 yrs. ...this old lady wants her generation to get out of the way; it is the next generation's time to LEAD and try to clean up the mess we've left them.

fg  03/31/2008 06:47 PM Report

Gov. Rendell wants to be vice president.

Max  03/31/2008 01:40 AM Report

Some really good signals. I really hope the gov delivers the Senator soon. Before PA. Why has she not appeared? Quite perplexing. Really need to hear unadulterated sounds from the Senator. Did not quite enjoy the massive time given to impartial opinion today. I hope in this case the end justifies the means. Go CHARLIE!!! LIGHT IT UP!!!!!!

Max  03/31/2008 01:40 AM Report

Some really good signals. I really hope the gov delivers the Senator soon. Before PA. Why has she not appeared? Quite perplexing. Really need to hear unadulterated sounds from the Senator. Did not quite enjoy the massive time given to impartial opinion today. I hope in this case the end justifies the means. Go CHARLIE!!! LIGHT IT UP!!!!!!

Fran BK  03/30/2008 03:24 PM Report

Why is the press ignorant of the Democratic Party rules? They buy Obama's spin every step of the way. He doesn't have over 2000 delegates, nor can he earn them, so he can't be the nominee! Like Kennedy, as you all say, he should negotiate with Senator Clinton to get her delegates, not tell her to drop out!!! What a low-life politician he is.

Fran BK  03/30/2008 03:24 PM Report

Why does the Press jump to adopt Obama's spin on a story?

Why didn't anyone point out in their "analysis" that Bill Richardson is so OBVIOUSLY looking to be the Democrat vice-presidential nominee. He knows that Senator Clinton doesn't need him on the ticket because she already has the Hispanic community vote backing her. Obama needs that vote. Why doesn't anyone ask if he promised Richardson the veep slot on his ticket for his endorsement? (That would be an offer like Judas received.)

Carol J  03/29/2008 11:38 PM Report

To Shaft and any others who may have forgotten not all states have had primaries etc. My state is one of them. Shaft you sound like the media. Senator Clinton should not quit and support Obama. My thoughts are: this campaign started to early and should not have. We should have had the chance to have more choices and I was disappointed when a couple bowed out so early on. There should be a time limit as to the length of campaign and how much money they can accumulate. Also maybe all 50 States should hold primaries and hold general election the same day. Then maybe get on with running the government instead of spending all their time politicking.

Irish  03/29/2008 09:36 PM Report

Uh, Shaft? You do know there are 12 million people out there still waiting to vote, right? And um, I just checked wikipedia and American Democrats dont actually crown people. For that you have to join the GOP and THEY want to replace their boy king with king lear apres le deluge. But good luck with all that!

fg  03/29/2008 08:21 PM Report

Bravo Shaft!

Shaft  03/29/2008 06:51 PM Report

Governer Rendell is an outstanding governer who deserves all the recognition he deserves, its also a strong point for him to endorse Sen. Clinton for the presidency. Despite all Governer Rendell's desire and Sen. Hillary Clinton's wishs to be the Democratic nominee, but the American people have chosen Sen. Obama to be the best choice for the Democratic nomination and ultimately for the Presidency. Personally, I too thought Sen. Hillary Clinton would be the favorite, but the new young man has come to claim crown, and Sen. Hillary Clinton should not be angry at all, what stands between her and the presidency is not Sen. Obama, it is TIME. Sen. Obama was not easily convinced by GWB to authorize the Iraq war, he was able to see much clearly what would ensue after the war of easy victory over Iraqi military. Hence, he deserve to lead the nation and the free world. The war has claimed over 4000 Americans and $TRILLION$. The crown belongs to the one that stands above and beyond philosophy, and that candidate is none other than Sen. Barack Obama.

yawning  03/28/2008 10:40 PM Report

Anna - just in case you really didnt get it - it is called sarcasm. Next time I will wave a big red flag. If I can stay awake that is.

chuckling  03/28/2008 10:37 PM Report

I love reading anti- clinton posts with women's names on them. One after the other all saying the same thing and using the same examples. It is like watching teevee - the same stuff said by 10 different people pretending they just thought it up!

Connie Kline  03/28/2008 05:36 PM Report

I just rewatched the 3/26/08 interview with Ed Rendell again online (thanks so much for providing these programs online),and it was even better the second time around. Hillary is so fortunate to have the support of such eloquent, knowledgable person as Governor Rendell. This was one of the best interviews I've seen on the program recently. I am one of the statistically-significant,incensed female demographic that Rendell referred to. I am astounded by the unfair, unbalanced, prejudicial media treatment of Hillary Clinton. It is unconscionable. I was especially interested in Rendell's reply to the inquiry about a specific example of this lopsided media coverage. As one who lives in between two disastrous nuclear power plants, I was stunned to learn that Obama had so flagrantly flip-flopped on the issue of nuclear plant safety which the NY Times, to its credit, covered and the rest of the media should have run with, but didn't touch. St. Barrack introduced an important nuclear reactor safety and community information bill in the Illinois Senate (Ill. has more reactors than any US state). However after accepting significant money from utilities and the nuclear industry, he watered down the bill, flip-flopped on the issue and became an advocate of nuclear power. You cannot call yourself a proponent of safe, clean, green energy and support nuclear power. It's an oxymoron. The media's reference to the so-called phenomenon of Obama "magic" should really be called Obama "sleight of hand."

Dan  03/28/2008 03:32 PM Report

I have always enjoyed your program and this is a good interview. I was suprised at your reaction that you did not realize that Obama was receiving favorable coverage. Here are some factual stories that illustrate it. I hope you will reivew them and seriously consider why the quality of journalism has declined. You seemed to have implied it is the campaigns doing it. If you look objectively at the coverage, you will see there is very little discussion of the issues by the media. It is mostly about the horse race and tactics.

Thanks. I hope you will take the time to read these.

http://www.sptimes.com/2008/03/09/Opinion/Media_tainted_by_anti.shtml

http://www.cmpa.com/index.html

http://www.cmpa.com/election%20news%203_3_08.htm

http://www.cmpa.com/election%20news%202_1_08.htm

http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59593

http://mediamatters.org/items/200802080012?f=s_search

anna  03/28/2008 01:47 PM Report

"Yawning" (comment, 3/27, 11:04) must have been tired. Maybe he or she doesn't realize not Ed Rendell's role in the Clinton campaign is to go on all the talk shows and offer up the latest campaign spin. Not that there's anything wrong with that, right, yawning? It's a time-honored political tradition. Ed Rendell seems like a great guy. I wonder why he can't find more positive things to say about Hillary in support of her candidacy than she's been victimzed by a press.

fj  03/28/2008 01:02 PM Report

Yes, I too wonder what kind of person would tolerate adultery as long as Mrs. Clinton has.

Holly  03/28/2008 12:23 PM Report

Really enjoyed the blogger's comment,paraphrased, that she/he couldn't believe Hillry's comment that SHE wouldn't have sat in that pew (Wright's church) for 20 yrs; however she would stay with cheating Bill for 20 plus years.

Here's the thing. HRC was a member of the SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE on INTELLIGENCE when she voted for the invasion of Iraq...fellow members, Feingold, Levin, Nelson (FL)and Hagel DID NOT!!!!!!!!!She didn't even read the NIS Report tho HANDED to her by Jay Rockefeller who asked her to read it before she VOTED. Her vote on that debacle was a political strategem, as much else in her life has been.

Michelle   03/28/2008 11:57 AM Report

Mr. Rose

I watched your interview last night with Mr. Ed Rendell from beginning to end. I knew he was going to be on, so as a Hillary supporter, I wanted to make sure I didn't miss it. It was everything I thought it would be and more. What a diamond he is. I hope you do have Senator Clinton on your show. As for your comment about being amused at Mr. Rendell comments about SNL, this reaction of yours only proved to me that you like many of the elititist media/politicians/liberals don't get it. It's one thing to be for Obama but when they beat up and deamonize a fellow democrat oppornent even when it appears she's down and out, I have a real problem with that. We HRC supporters were finally glad that someone had the hutzpah (spelling ?) to say what we wanted to say but had not the power of the pen or TV camera to do it. I was in church choir the Sunday morning after the first SNL show of the season and fellow Hillary supports in the choir and I discussed the impact of this show and how glad we were that finally someone was telling it like it is. Hooray for TINA FEY. After all she went through in January and February, I hope Sen Clinton goes all the way. Even with Bosnia, she's the better choice. I know who she is and what she's done the last 35 years, plus she's married to a former president under whose administration we experience peace and prosperity. Why would I vote for the other guy whose face I saw once at the dem national convention 4 years ago and hadn't heard of since? What does he bring to the table? His speech was politically motivated and should be noted with an asterisk denoting "writting under duress to save his policital *ss." As for his stand an Iraq, I've been an anti-Iraq war protester and have marched at all the major protests in DC and NYC in 2002, 2003 and 2007. I disagree with Dashle who told Mark Green in a radio interview last Saturday that BO has the morale authority on the Iraq war. BUNK! He made a speech at an anti-war rally and wasn't in the senator with the other senators who had to make decisions based on the information they were given. He's such a fraud on that issues. As for foreign poolicy experience, at least HRC didn't claim her foreign policy experience was based on having lived in a country as a child. By the way why didn't the media make a big deal when HRC received endorsements from John Glenn and Murtha? Why didn't we hear that she won New Mexico? All we hear is that she's a divider, comments about her appearance, her laugh, that she's going through menopause. I'm sick of it. I'm mad. You want change? How about the first woman president of the free world!! Wouldn't THAT englighten the world leaders who are mostly male and the men (black and white) in our country who say a woman president would not be respected by other countries. Mostly a woman president of the of the free world would inspire the many women all over the world who have been raped, maimed, mutiliated, beheaded and killed in the name of war, tradition and religion. Viva Hillary.

Thank you for your time.

Michelle Aguilar

Ryan Gibbs  03/28/2008 11:57 AM Report

As an independent with democratic party leanings I was in the beginning a Hilliary supporter. Most of this support was due to the respect I had for President Bill Clinton as a politician. I also saw her as a viable candidate that knew the "fight" in politics. And more than anything I believed that behind the curtain people that espoused equality would not vote for Obama. Well things have changed. I understand some of the establishment with loyalties for the Clintons as Gov. Rendell does.

But at what point does this become divisive enough to split democrats? The republicans know how to fall in line but democrats do not, at least not easily. As President Clinton once said, republicans "fall in line" while democrats "fall in love." We seem to be seeing that in this primary.

Here is my over-all assessment. I come from a "red state" and I can tell you that no matter who the nominee is on the democratic side, a republican will win. The argument that Obama couldn't win California or NY just because Clinton won the primary is laughable. W won NY over McCain in 2000 and we didn't see a landslide go to President Bush in the general. And I truly believe that Obama can win swing states such as VA and PA in the general election, especially with the right VP choice.

Also I am not an evangelical, but many of my large extended family is. I hear more support for Obama from these people than McCain, and certainly more Obama support than for Clinton (which is nil). Deserved or not, Hillary is damaged goods in a general election. Obama has the chance to bring in both sides of the isle where I can almost guarantee Hillary will not. She is not trusted by the right. Obama actually does well in my "family polling" because they want change like anyone else. It takes faith and hope that Obama is that candidate. If anything, the religious understand faith and hope.

Michelle  03/28/2008 07:22 AM Report

Mr. Rose

I watched your interview last night with Mr. Ed Rendell from beginning to end. I knew he was going to be on, so as a Hillary supporter, I wanted to make sure I didn't miss it. It was everything I thought it would be and more. What a diamond he is. I hope you do have Senator Clinton on your show. As for your comment about being amused at Mr. Rendell comments about SNL, this reaction of yours only proved to me that you like many of the elititist media/politicians/liberals don't get it. It's one thing to be for Obama but when they beat up and deamonize a fellow democrat oppornent even when it appears she's down and out, I have a real problem with that. We HRC supporters were finally glad that someone had the hutzpah (spelling ?) to say what we wanted to say but had not the power of the pen or TV camera to do it. I was in church choir the Sunday morning after the first SNL show of the season and fellow Hillary supports in the choir and I discussed the impact of this show and how glad we were that finally someone was telling it like it is. Hooray for TINA FEY. After all she went through in January and February, I hope Sen Clinton goes all the way. Even with Bosnia, she's the better choice. I know who she is and what she's done the last 35 years, plus she's married to a former president under whose administration we experience peace and prosperity. Why would I vote for the other guy whose face I saw once at the dem national convention 4 years ago and hadn't heard of since? What does he bring to the table? His speech was politically motivated and should be noted with an asterisk denoting "writting under duress to save his policital *ss." As for his stand an Iraq, I've been an anti-Iraq war protester and have marched at all the major protests in DC and NYC in 2002, 2003 and 2007. I disagree with Dashle who told Mark Green in a radio interview last Saturday that BO has the morale authority on the Iraq war. BUNK! He made a speech at an anti-war rally and wasn't in the senator with the other senators who had to make decisions based on the information they were given. He's such a fraud on that issues. As for foreign poolicy experience, at least HRC didn't claim her foreign policy experience was based on having lived in a country as a child. By the way why didn't the media make a big deal when HRC received endorsements from John Glenn and Murtha? Why didn't we hear that she won New Mexico? All we hear is that she's a divider, comments about her appearance, her laugh, that she's going through menopause. I'm sick of it. I'm mad. You want change? How about the first woman president of the free world!! Wouldn't THAT englighten the world leaders who are mostly male and the men (black and white) in our country who say a woman president would not be respected by other countries. Mostly a woman president of the of the free world would inspire the many women all over the world who have been raped, maimed, mutiliated, beheaded and killed in the name of war, tradition and religion. Viva Hillary.

Thank you for your time.

Michelle Aguilar

Lyn  03/27/2008 11:16 PM Report

Charlie, I have watched you for decades and this is the first time I remeber being so dissapointed with you. If you want to have an idea why Women are so mad read this article by media matters about the sexist remarks at JUST MSNBC, http://mediamatters.org/items/200802080012?f=s_search CNN is just as bad with their media bias. I know many Hillary supporters who have started watching Fox because at least the coverage is more fair, they don't like Dems but they don't show the bias.

As for what the news hasn't told about Obama,The reason I will never vote for him is because of who he surrounds himself with. He goes to a church for 20 years and didn't realize the pastor hated America? Also the media has barely touched his long relationship with Rezko and thru Rezko his connection to Auchi, Saddams' money man. Then there is his relationship with Ayer's the home grown terrorist that on Sept 11th said the thing he regretted about the places he bombed in the US in the 60s was he didn't do enough bombing. And this is the guy who wants to be president? I blame the media that the truth about Obama is not well known.

Irish  03/27/2008 11:10 PM Report

jawbone - Charlie is always like that when the "media" gets dissed. I think he feels honor bound to defend the dishonorable. Plus more than half his guests - it seems - are media types taling about media issues. It is not a particularly effective defense to deny everything...makes one less credible...but Charlie is not going to change. At least he let the Governor say what he wanted to say since he wants the "get" of having Senator Clinton come on....He would have stuck a sock in anyone else.

MotherLodeBeth  03/27/2008 11:06 PM Report

Its the Clinton's Machiavellian ways that turn me off. And its the same old woe is me victim mentality they use when things aren't going their way or they don't like people not liking Hillary simply because she lies and has this attitude that she is owed the Presidency. Never mind that this week she made a dumb speech where she said if she had been in a church for twenty years with a minister who said things she disagreed with she would have left. Hmmmmm. So being in a marriage for decades with someone who cheats on you is better? Excuses Excuses.

Holly Hilden  03/27/2008 11:05 PM Report

Re: Conversation with Gov. Rendell

I am a 68 year old woman who is an active supporter of Sen. Barack Obama's candidacy for president.

It is mind-boggling to me that anyone, including the governor who is married to a judge(!) thinks women are bludgeoned by inopportunity because of gender!

As Sen. Obama has said,paraphrased, are the facts of his name (!) and race not impediments in running for the highest office in the land?

My goodness, Hillary's claim to anything is by osmosis; from her carpetbagging a senatorship from NY (why not run from Illinois or Arkansas?)to foreign policy (Ireland's peace treaty, eh what?)to being the pillar that passed the Family Leave bill (16 days into Bill's first term!) to suthorship of SCHIP (tell that to Orrin Hatch and Ted Kennedy)...

What Ed Rendell and Hillary's supporters don't get is that MOST AMERICANS OF EITHER GENDER simply can't stand the bionic woman (sniperfire in Bosnia)...listening to an Hillary stump speech or mindnumbing address is akin to listening to your least favorite teacher or prof...the latest Hillary-Heinlich(sp)Manuever, McAufflife's bullying letter to Spkr Pelosi re superdelegates (translation: Hillary's moneybags won't fund the DCCC anymore)is further proof that Billary, Inc. won't stop the ferocious arm-twisting ever...like the Energizer bunny, she just goes on and on and on..

Every dollar I donate to Barack Obama's campaign is done in the memory of two black women, who, with my mother, impacted my life forever...had they been white, they would have succeeded beyond imagining. Gender didn't stop them, race did.

Shame on you Ed Rendell...women, and Hillary in particular, have done very, very well in the print and TV media.

yawning  03/27/2008 11:04 PM Report

Yeah "Ginny", it sucks when Governors get on teevee to talk about politics. What do THEY have to do with it? Could we raise the intellectual bar here a tad?

Connie  03/27/2008 10:50 PM Report

OMG, Charlie Rose! Could you actually have doubt that the Clintons, both of them, have been object of more media disdain than anyone else in the last 30 years, much less Barack Obama??? Governor Ed Rendellâ??s comments were a small breath of fresh air in terms of what substance could occur in a national debate. I was surprised to observe that I was actually experiencing physical relief in my body during Gov. Rendellâ??s comments. Someone is actually getting air time pointing out that our country is being deprived of political debate of substantial issues. I was slack jawed listening to the pundits following the recent CNN debate between Clinton and Obama. The six people I watched it with â?? both Clinton and Obama supporters, unanimously agreed that Hillary completely out performed Obama. We all thought her appearance was fresher, she was more approachable, she was engaging, and most importantly she was outstandingly more specific in her answers. But not according to CNN â?? their pundits hands down awarded the winner as Obama. We all wondered which debate they were watching. I believe Hillaryâ??s tears received, and even continues to receive, more commentary than the possibility Bush 2 received during his first campaign that he might be an alcoholic. Even his recent admission did not receive as much coverage. Really, does the possibility that Hillary choked up warrant days of debate and continued commentary as compared to the economy, the war, energy, etc. Only the faintest of innuendo occurred regarding Bush 1â??s possible straying from his marriage â?? and not ONCE has anyone wondered why Barbara stayed with her husband. Neither Rep. Henry Hydeâ??s nor Rep Newt Gingrichâ??s philandering received much more than a blip on the radar â?? all while they were leading and even inciting the witch hunt against Pres. Clinton. These are not the subjects I want to be in the forefront of national political discussions, but since this is the ruler by which the Clintons are measured over and over again, it would certainly be interesting to see just how many other candidates could stand up to 30 years of similar scrutiny. I believe the Clintons are HUMAN, no more or less than their contemporaries and predecessors. To be honest, I have waivered between Clinton and Obama. Like so many others, they both appeal to me. But the media coverage tends to make me more sympathetic to her, because like her or not I donâ??t think ANY of her contemporaries could be called more tenacious. And that makes me think her leadership can better withstand the Washington upenders. Am I angry about the unfairness of the media coverage? You bet â?? not for Hillaryâ??s sake but for AMERICAâ??s sake.

Ginny Faber  03/27/2008 10:40 PM Report

Shame on you Charlie Rose--for giving a voice to the Clinton spin machine. When I turned on the show last night, several minutes into the Ed Rendell interview, I thought for a second that I had tuned in the wrong channel. Was this Hardball with Chris Matthews?

When Rendell talks about the anti-women bias behind the reporting of Clinton's New Hampshire tears, he should remember the way the press ripped Howard Dean apart for his over-the-top enthusiasm after a key win. Rendell's "poor Hillary, the candidate-as-victim" spin when questioned about her Bosnia lie, was a bit more troubling. Until she began Obama bashing, Clinton's Day One readiness

was the central theme of her campaign. It was a dubious claim to begin with, but the Bosnia story was not mere spin or embellishment. It was fiction, an outright lie. As Frank Rich recently wrote, character--or lack of it--matters. Important questions are being raised about Clinton's honesty and her honor not by a "hostile" media, but because as this campaign has progressed, she has shown so little of both. As a woman, I find her default position when challenged, to play the victim, throughly distasteful.

What does it mean, then, that Charlie Rose as

virtually promised that if Hillary appeared on his show, he would not ask sticky questions? Inviting Clinton apologists like Rendell on his show in the guise of serious discussion , was less than I'd expect of Charlie Rose, no matter how much he wants Hillary as a guest. If the Clinton candidacy represents the old-style power politics of the backrooom, then last night I saw a little more of Mr. Rose's own backroom maneuvering than I cared to.

Irish  03/27/2008 09:55 PM Report

Nicole - I am so glad you are not angry. Because goodness knows every other woman who doesn't share your perspective must be angry. Or employed in a competitive job for over a few years. Whatever. I am chary to say this (thanks O'Toole!), but do you think it might be considered "embellishment" to say you are "participating" in media simply by posting on an anonymous chat board? Is that on your resume? Is a letter to the editor journalism? When you blow out a candle are you a firefighter, too? Neat! But some of us actually have to show up and prove ourselves and are judged by our output. Gosh, how you must HATE when that happens. But you do not get angry around men! No, you save it for women. Thanks ever so.

Nicole P  03/27/2008 09:17 PM Report

Tsk, Tsk, can we shelve the anger around men. I am a woman and I am not angry. I am getting very tired of the Clintonista rhetoric. Poor Hillary born a woman and unable to win the hearts of all the Democrats. Come on. Poor Hillary always criticized by the big bad media. Get real. Everyone one of you who wrote on this blog are participating in the media. It is a wonder to me that the footage from Bosnia wasn't released earlier in the campaign after the first time she "misspoke". I guess as a woman I should think of that as an endearing quality in a woman. That I should feel free to embellish activities I have been in so that I can seem more, dare I say, "macho". I guess I should just face up to the fact that the Clintonistas would like the media to operate like it does in China. Where it goes through harmonization. Remember the term spin. That came about during the earlier Clinton regime and I am not willing to go back there.

Elizabeth  03/27/2008 09:12 PM Report

Dear Mr. Rose,

With all due respect, this democratic process to select a Democratic nominee that mirrors the core values of the Democratic Party has been sabotaged by the media way before the first Tuesday. The Clintons have done great work as public servants and have earned rightfully the respect/acknowledgement of not only "lunch bucket democrats" but all Americans across socioeconomic and cultural/racial lines.

In the Rendell interview, you asked:

HAS THE MEDIA BEEN BIASED AGAINST HILLARY?

WHAT HAS THE MEDIA NOT COVERED ABOUT OBAMA?

IS SEN. CLINTON EXAGERRATING HER FOREIGN EXPERIENCE AS FIRST LADY?

ISN'T THE WRIGHT TOPIC A CLINTON DISTRACTION?

Wow. I hope you invite more experts to delve into these issues objectively.

A log of leading news stories and number of days/hours/minutes spent per newscast can answer your first question about media bias emperically. If not, get Noam Chompsky, Deborah Tannen, or any leading linguist to analyze/deconstruct the use of language in reporting news/stories of Sen. Clinton/Obama.

Second, what the media has NOT COVERED about Obama is his Senate Record. 11,000 pages missing. Other news agencies such as ABC salivated at the prospect of uncovering more dirt in Sen. Clinton's White House papers as First Lady, only to suggest her presence in the WH at the same time as Lewinsky (see Brian Ross' sad example of National Enquirer style reporting and bias).

For future shows, how about doing a simple year by year comparison/contrast of Sen. Obama's U.S. Senate accomplishments/votes/endeavors vs. Sen. Clinton.

Instead of focusing on her Bosnia mistatement, why not just be fair and show Obama's mistatements and half-truths and outright lies as well (lots of video footage on youtube for support).

The Commander in Chief readiness is a critical debate question.

Ask Obama or his surrogates what his credentials are in foreign affairs from involvement in key committees to authorships of policies, etc. Surrounding oneself with strong minds/leaders is only a small part of being commander. Do the same for Sen. Clinton. Too bad Ross Perot is not around in this election; He was keen on pie charts and graphs to show people visually what things meant. Can you imagine mapping bar graphs showing number of years served in the US Senate, number of votes taken, number of yes votes in specific categories such as health, military, economic policies etc. We're missing objective analysis.

I am singulary unimpressed with journalists who have come on the show remarking the world is waiting for Obama to rebuild our bridges. How about the more important question: THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE WAITING TO REBUILD THEIR LIVES IN THE HERE AND NOW. Which candidate understands their needs and has the hands-on know how to deliver meaningful, inclusive changes? I look forward to seeing future shows that go to the heart of the matter--stop analyzing speeches and start the dialogue to study actions. Thank you.

Maggie Maxwell  03/27/2008 09:05 PM Report

Well, I see that many folks have beat me to the punch. Your sour and sarcastic attitude with Gov. Rendell last night was So Obvious. In addition you acted (am I making a major leap) surprised about how your colleagues have been so blatantly Biased toward Obama and against Senator Clinton. And then to further dismiss the personal story that Gov. Rendell related to you about how his wife felt. You, Mr Rose, are truly Disappointing. I was glad that I saw your program last night which I rarely watch any more because Gov. Rendell was succinct, factual and even tempered. That was worth watching. You no longer are worth my time.

John & Katherine  03/27/2008 09:03 PM Report

Mr. Rose,

Apparently you have not seen any TV in the last 6 months. The entire media of TV, print, right wing radio and left wing radio has been in 24/7 promotion of Obama mode and 24/7 villification of Hillary mode. It's blatant and shameless. MSNBC has become the Obama network. They don't even pretend to be fair. Fox is more fair (and it pains us to say that).

We are lawyers who support Hillary Rodham Clinton because she's the most qualified and most electable candidate in the race. We also love William Jefferson Clinton and do not appreciate Barack Hussein Obama's attempts to denigrate a former President of his OWN party.

The Democratic Party needs to be reminded it is white women who make up the majority of Dem voters. They make them angry at their own peril.

Barack Hussein Obama is unelectable. No amount of media promotion will ever make him electable. Obama chose to continually interject racism, classism, & sexism into this campaign at his own peril.

Obama made a fatal mistake in defiantly refusing to completely disassociate himself from the toxic "pastor" Jeremiah Wright.

Wright is the gift that keeps on giving. Unfortunately, the Dems don't need this kind of gift.

What kind of man, what kind of father would subject his own part white children to the racist, anti-white, anti-Italian,anti-American, anti-semitic, pro-Farakhaan, black supremecy, nation of islam supporter Wright who believes that the "U.S. Govt created AIDS to kill black people" and that the "U.

S. brought 9/11 on ourselves"?????

THIS is the man Obama calls his "mentor". WHY?

It calls into question the lack of character and poor judgment of Obama. It's most certainly not Presidential, Vice Presidential or U.S. Senatorial. Obama does not belong on the Dems ticket at all. He's toxic.

Obama's new pastor Moss is no better. Obama's negatives are rapidly rising with the Wright, Moss, Crown, Exelon, and Rezko revelations.

If the Dems fail to nominate Hillary we will be McCain Dems in November. For us, it's country first, party second. We simply do not like and do not trust Barack Hussein Obama.

Irish  03/27/2008 09:02 PM Report

Rendell is so solid. Wonderful nterview. But Charlie, you sure are defensive about the media. Or maybe it is that you are in denial. I think you need to meet More real women Outside the media you circle because you seem to have No Idea what we think or feel in the real world this primary season. Pooh poohing us makes you look shabby.

jawbone  03/27/2008 08:17 PM Report

"In Time, Mark Halperin provides a list of â??Painful Things Hillary Clinton Knowsâ??Or Should Know.â?? No. 7: â??The Rev. Wright story notwithstanding, the media still wants Obama to be the nomineeâ??and that has an impact every day.â?? Weâ??ve come full circle. So confident have the Beltway media courtiers grown in their social and political status that what once was furiously denied is now boasted about. Politicians may come and go, but Chris Matthews, Howard Fineman, Tim Russert and Maureen Dowd preside over a permanent House of Lords."~~~~Gene Lyons, 3/26/08

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Mark Halperin has noticed the media bias and written about it!

jawbone  03/27/2008 07:37 PM Report

I was not surprised when you were surprised that Gov. Rendell said the media is biased against Hillary Clinton. When one is on the inside looking out, one tends to absorb the feelings and views of one's cohorts. You might want to get out more, Charlie!

Think about this: Maureen Dowd wrote a column in which she used the word "bitch" about Sen. Clinton, albeit in quoting a "comedian" telling a "joke."

I have never seen any other sitting US Senator, former First Lady, and leading presidential candidate of a major party ( or any party!) be labeled a "bitch" on the pages of the New York Times. I can't even think of a similar term for men and certainly no such word has been used on the pages of the NYTimes about any leading male politician.

Sexism and misogyny is indeed alive and well in this country, and bias against Hillary Clinton is rampant among many of leading pundits, analysts, and reporters in the Mainstream Corporate Media (MCM).

Mary B  03/27/2008 07:25 PM Report

I'm shocked that you are shocked to hear that a lot of people think that the media is biased in favor of Senator Obama. It is so evident, that I wonder whether you are watching any news shows. Believe me, it's alive and well and the viewers are well aware of it. My husband, who is totall oblivious to these type of things even picked up on it. Thank you Governor Rendell for stating the obvious. A lot of people are angry about how the media has slanted this race in favor of Senator Obama.

Margie Walker  03/27/2008 07:04 PM Report

Gov. Rendell had it right when it comes to many women and their impression of how the media has treated Senator Clinton. I was very disappointed by Charlie's response to this point. You laughed. I wish you could realize how that comes across as patronizing to many women. With experiences throughout our lives of prejudice in school, workplaces and homes, prejudices unique to being female, please try to understand. We have been told can't, shouldn't, etc. and have watched over and over as the younger and less experienced men get promoted over women who have worked harder and longer. To many women, this election is playing out that same scenario. Senator Clinton has the policy, Senator Obama has the popularity. As for Gov. Rendell's comments about Keith Olbermann, all you have to do is look at the interview he had with Senator Obama about Rev. Wright's comments to know that the Governor is right on. When Senator Obama appeared on Keith's show he stated that he had never been in the pew when Rev. Wright made any hateful remarks. Keith accepted it, but Jonathan Alter (surprisingly) said not so fast. He said that there was no way that Senator Obama had not been there, because such comments by the Reverend were so well known in the Chicago area and if Senator Obama had been attending church regularly, he would have had to been present for some of those type of comments. When the Senator made his speech, he confessed that he had been in the pew for some of the comments. Not a work from Keith. Senator Obama had lied on his show, in his presence and Keith said nothing about it. Yet he has played Senator Clinton's "misremembering" about her Bosnia trip at least twice.

Anna  03/27/2008 06:53 PM Report

Charlie,

I certainly hope you were playing the devil's advocate, because if you truly think the things you were saying then I have lost ALL respect for you. Will you answer? The only thing Gov Rendel was wrong about is the angry women coming back around if Hillary is not the nominee.

I am another woman like Helena and JJ!

CognitiveDissonance  03/27/2008 06:47 PM Report

Another one bites the dust! Yet another TV pundit becomes an Obama 527. No wonder he's spending so much money. Gotta keep those pundits fed. Is it any wonder that most of America holds you folks in lower contempt than used car salesmen?

no longer a viewer  03/27/2008 06:39 PM Report

Mr.Rose,

Whatever respect I had for you has gone out the window...you bias towards Obama is SOOO obvious.. and BTW I am no some angry woman... I am a blue-collar man who has trouble paying my bills, afraid that I may miss a house paymnet and lose my house...

And Hillary I feel is the only one who can deliver... the democratic party no longer represents me... and I called the DNC to ask to NOT openly support Obama... and they said oh well these wounds will heal by Nov.... NO!...

along with this "finally proud of america" wife and his "anti-white", "anti-america", "anti-sematic" preacher...if this DNC nominates Obama... I will be reluctantly voting against Obama... and vote Mccain and dem. the rest of the ticket...

I did not leave the democratic party...it no longer represents the middle class worker and has left me. thank you.