In order to download Charlie Rose podcasts to iTunes for transfer to an iPod, you must have iTunes installed. If you do, please click the following link to download the podcast for this interview:
itpc://www.charlierose.com/view/itunes/8346
Otherwise, close this window to continue viewing.
Close
Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1
Bobbie Robinson 09/10/2008 09:21 AM Report
On this Hasselback thing. McCain went there & used his stump of "drill, drill, drill, which he was asked not to do. He answered several questions wrong, never mind our he looked. The Evangelicals know, that " He cannot defeat evil. It is written, that when one tries to do good, evil is always present. McCain was asked about his faith....He said..."I have faith in the American people, when the American people are looking for one they can put their faith in. I am surprized that he missed that question,with all millions they have, for the answer is written on " the money" ...."In God we Trust". All the rest on his war experience, using a 40 year old war experience, to lead in the 21st Century. I'll just leave this with you; for it is written.." Old men dream dreams, and young men see visions,and with a vision the people perish" McCain is just dreaming only of becoming President, thats all, without regard for the needs of the country and the people, thats why he does not talk about the issues. There is nothing else to look forward to, for they have money and all their needs, and to be President is his desire, selfish reasons only. I can hardly watch McCain & his running mate, for real....they give me an actual headache.
leroy 09/04/2008 02:22 PM Report
laughing about axelrods speech impearament is immature, for a so call intellect who hobby appeares to be politics where you have some of the greatest minds in the field brainstroming, I could understand why ms. manner is sending a comment instead of the one being interviewed. have you ever heard of take the beam out of your own eye first, then you can see clearly enough to help your brother remove the little tiny speck out of his eye
leroy 09/04/2008 02:12 PM Report
ms manner,you are so stupid,for one,listen to the message not the messaginger!! axelrod is one of the smartest minds in the polictical areana. just look at what happen to the hilary clinton machine uh uh so it doesnt look like your observation uh uh , doesnt mean anything.no one is perfect give credit where it is due do you have any inperfections? oh, I forgot your JESUS
Uh UHHHH 05/25/2008 03:44 AM Report
Uh, uh, uh, uh.... didn't we uh flunk speech class uh in uh freshman year for too uh many UHs???? Damn, uh Mr. uh Axelrod, uh, PLEASE uh lose uh thuh UHs... I uh changed channels to uh Letterman uh because uh you uh were uh driving me uh nuts uh uh uh uh......
UH!!
Ariane 04/06/2008 04:13 AM Report
Todd what on EARTH are you talking about? Did you even watch this? WHAT attacks on Clinton? I'm having trouble even imagining how you could have heard it that way aside from extreme paranoia with hallucinations. He gave Sen. Clinton a great deal of praise that sounded quite genuine and talked about his enormous respect for her. Having seen your post before watching the video, I kept expecting attacks and when he followed compliments with "...but", I was sure that withering criticism, sniper fire, etc. was to follow - - but no, all he said was at this time he thought Obama was a candidate who could bring the country together. Nothing negative about Hillary at all, in fact he said if she is the nominee he'd be the first to sign up to support her.
As far as advertisement one kind of expects a campaign manager to talk positively about their candidate but he seemed to make an attempt to answer Charlie's questions in a thoughtful way, not just doing a stock speech.
btw like "My, My", I too wondered if several of these superficial comments were by the same person- I've heard speakers far more distracting than Mr. Axelrod and I seem to be able to pay attention to what a person is talking about rather than letting myself become so easily distracted by their style of speech.
Ariane 04/06/2008 04:13 AM Report
Todd what on EARTH are you talking about? Did you even watch this? WHAT attacks on Clinton? I'm having trouble even imagining how you could have heard it that way aside from extreme paranoia with hallucinations. He gave Sen. Clinton a great deal of praise that sounded quite genuine and talked about his enormous respect for her. Having seen your post before watching the video, I kept expecting attacks and when he followed compliments with "...but", I was sure that withering criticism, sniper fire, etc. was to follow - - but no, all he said was at this time he thought Obama was a candidate who could bring the country together. Nothing negative about Hillary at all, in fact he said if she is the nominee he'd be the first to sign up to support her.
As far as advertisement one kind of expects a campaign manager to talk positively about their candidate but he seemed to make an attempt to answer Charlie's questions in a thoughtful way, not just doing a stock speech.
btw like "My, My", I too wondered if several of these superficial comments were by the same person- I've heard speakers far more distracting than Mr. Axelrod and I seem to be able to pay attention to what a person is talking about rather than letting myself become so easily distracted by their style of speech.
Todd 04/04/2008 09:11 AM Report
Here is a picture of David Axelrod - a Marketing Director - NOT a "campaign strategist". Here he is, a Marketing Man with the Capitol Dome in the background. How appropriate. And he used your show, Mr. Rose, as one big long advertisement and attack tool. You should have canned this episode.
In contrast, your interview with Gov. Ed Rendell was never used by the Governor to trash Mr. Obama. It was used to inform and explain his support for Senator Clinton over Obama based on her competencies. And you really did needlessly give him a difficult time. It epitomized the media problems that are NOT in question - 89% of American's polled state it is obvious - NOT a question.
Mr. Axelrod turns every interview he gives into a Senator Clinton bashing opportunity. That's the kind of people they are. You did not control his use of your show to do this.
The difference between these interviews and their supporters is the difference between these candidates.
Sorry about the pot hole.
My, my 04/04/2008 12:56 AM Report
Such superficial critics in this post, probably from the same Clinton supporter. You're right to be running frightened. You are backing a pathelogical lyer. Bosnia fire-fight single handedly carried the day. Whew! A la WMD's, yellow cake, mission accomplished, our economy is strong, yadda, yadda. Spare us!
Ms. Manners 04/04/2008 12:31 AM Report
David Axelrod: Please spare the PBS viewing audience your disjointed and uneloquent comments. Your delivery of the information you try to present is sullied by your poor public speaking skills. Suggestion: Hire someone more eloquent to speak for you.
Ms. Manners
Uh UHHHH 04/04/2008 12:26 AM Report
Uh, uh, uh, uh.... didn't we uh flunk speech class uh in uh freshman year for too uh many UHs???? Damn, uh Mr. uh Axelrod, uh, PLEASE uh lose uh thuh UHs... I uh changed channels to uh Letterman uh because uh you uh were uh driving me uh nuts uh uh uh uh......
UH!!
Matt H. 04/03/2008 11:28 PM Report
I am watching Charlie interview David Axelrod, who is obviously a smart individual. But David should be trained or train himself not to say "uhhhh" hundreds of times during a single interview. I am driven to distraction by this oratorical crutch. If you don't have a word to fill every single second of your speech, please fill it with a dramatic pause, rather than this monosyllabic brain fart. Please...stop. Ok, I am changing the channel. Sorry, David, you lost me at "uhhhhh".
Signed,
-- A concerned viewer.