- Description
An hour-long conversation with Democratic Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York, in which she discusses her memoirs "Living History" and her goals as a politician, her outlook on the the war in Iraq, and her positions on health care and economic policy.
In order to download Charlie Rose podcasts to iTunes for transfer to an iPod, you must have iTunes installed. If you do, please click the following link to download the podcast for this interview:
itpc://www.charlierose.com/view/itunes/1925
Otherwise, close this window to continue viewing.
Close
Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1
liyqff 05/23/2011 09:41 PM Report
Hello, everybody, the good shoping place, the new season approaching, click in.
Welcome to http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com
Air Jordan (1-24) shoes $35
UGG BOOT $50
Nike shox (R4, NZ, OZ, TL1, TL2, TL3) $35
Handbags ( Coach Lv fendi D&G) $35
T-shirts (polo, ed hardy, lacoste) $16
Jean (True Religion, ed hardy, coogi)$34
Sunglasses ( Oakey, coach, Gucci, Armaini)$15
New era cap $16
Bikini (Ed hardy, polo) $18
FREE SHIPPING
http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com
http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com
http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com
http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com
http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com
http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com
===?http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com ?===
===? http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com ?===
===?http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com?===
===?http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com?===
===?http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com?===
===? http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com ?===
===? http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com ?===
This is a shopping paradise
We need your support and trust!
=== http://www.fashion-long-4biz.com ===
tartufe 12/29/2008 02:14 PM Report
How will the Obama-Clinton-Gates team handle the 300 and counting carnage the Israeli's are meting out as we speak.
Will they continue the dishonest brokerage and continue the kowtowing to our M.E. mirror image? Continue to ramp up hatred to the point they ALL wish for the 'bomb' in their extant impotence?
They make compatible (equally unhealthy) partners. We too like to rub our enemies noses in their own excrement and bomb them if they complain, revolt or insurrect(wd?).
The Zionist's lobby will make chumps out of Obama, Clinton, Gates et al and we can keep the M.E. Misery going right into Armageddon. Our M-I complex is having a Happy Hanukkah. They can smell the blood of the 300, as it turns to green in their offshore bank accounts. The bombs, shells, munitions that has to be replaced OYE!. We'll pay as usual but the M-I vampires will always get theirs.
Olmert's timing may needlessly have been hurried to occur before Bush's term expires. But he needn't worry -
OBAMA-CLINTON-GATES WILL "CHANGE" NOTHING!!! THE CAMPAIGN IS OVER! THE REAL WORLD ISN'T WAITING TO TEST THEIR LIES! NOR IS OLMERT!
tartufe 12/23/2008 06:01 PM Report
WORLD’S TOP THREE SCAMERS OF U.S. TREASURY: 1. OSAMA BIN LADEN, 2. NOURI MALAKI, 3. HAMID KARZAI. (HENRY PAULSON HONORABLE MENTION).
OSAMA BIN LADEN
11/01/04 - Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden said he is trying to bankrupt the U.S. through its war on terror, a strategy he says felled the Soviet Union two decades ago in Afghanistan, according to a translation by al-Jazeera television of his videotaped statement.
“All that we have to do is to send two mujahedeen to the furthest point East to raise a piece of cloth on which is written al-Qaeda, in order to make the generals race there to cause America to suffer human, economic, and political losses without their achieving for it anything of note other than some benefits for their private companies,” bin Laden said, according to the al-Jazeera transcript.
Well, the wiley old fox may live in a cave but he’s well on his way. And he even cites the M-I complex - accurately!
NOURI MALIKI (VIA BUSH, CHENEY, M-I COMPLEX OF COURSE)
By Bob Deans Cox News Service Published on: 02/28/08.
The Iraq war will cost Americans between $3 trillion and $5 trillion, including military spending, broader economic costs and decades of benefits and medical care for combat veterans, a Nobel prize-winning economist told the Joint Economic Committee on Thursday.
HAMID KARZAI
“And Afghanistan will not allow the international community leave it before we are fully on our feet, before we are strong enough to defend our country, before we are powerful enough to have a good economy.” Karzai said.
He then added that the world community can’t leave “before we have taken from President Bush and the next administration billions and billions of more dollars.”
“No way that they can let you go.” said Karzai, whose remarks drew laughter.
As of last summer, the United States had spent about $200 billion on the war in Afghanistan, according to congressional officials. Both Bush and President-elect Obama have made continued U.S. military involvement in Afghanistan central to their foreign policies.
HENRY PAULSON - HONORABLE MENTION
By: CNBC.com [28 Nov 2008 ] 01:56 PM ET
Given the speed at which the federal government is throwing money at the financial crisis, the average taxpayer, never mind member of Congress might not be faulted for losing track.
CNBC, however, has been paying very close attention and keeping a running tally of actual spending as well as the commitments involved. And there’s been quite a jump since we last tabulated things two weeks ago.
Try $7.36 trillion dollars. That’s more than double what was spent on WWII, if adjusted for inflation, based on our computations from a variety of estimates and sources.
COMMENTARY
We (Congress/Bush) have given Mr. Paulson a license to steal (TARP).
He has outdone the top three non-resident scammers, and history will wonder (1) how he did it, (2) how he gained the presumptive right(?), and (3) why he was never tried, convicted and incarcerated (for crimes against humanity if nothing else). Of course many other conspirators are due the same attention. Citigroup, a large recipient of TARP funds to rescue their hedge fund operations - the very corrosive part that should be allowed to fail - comes to mind.
It’s obvious that to date the financial wise-guy hedgers got the bailout medicine when excising the putrescent corruption from the financial body before gangrene set in was what was really needed. The really vulnerable and more extensive mortgagee’s crises have gone begging (literally). The predators seem to prevail a la the law of the jungle. Maybe we’re not that much a higher form of animal after all?
Oligarchic governance is a lethal combination. Like a corrupt cop.
Paulson et al should be consigned to living under a Detroit bridge for the downturn’s duration with their victims. Osama bin Laden has to be applauding him and all his ilk - firing his AK47 in the air with great jubilation over the accomplishments of the three non US coconspirators, but doubtless equally exuberant for his unexpected partner and allies “Allie Baba Paulson and his forty plus thieves.”
We’re run by a ship of fools, venal whores and grasping children.
James David 09/25/2008 03:01 PM Report
Irrespective of what many have said and still say, I both like and admire Senator Clinton. The United States (in particular, the Democratic Party) has missed a great opportunity in not nominating her for the Oval Office, and has, I believe, instead decided to gamble with a man who - whilst a symbol of tranformation and political acumen - does not have nearly the same reserves of strength and wisdom.
Joshua Jones 03/18/2008 10:20 PM Report
Listening to presentations and interviews, I think it revealing of the interviewee's credibility and security to count the use of the word, 'obviously', where the counts are inversely proportional to my favorable opinion. Senator Clinton used 'obviously' frequently enough to make me notice it as a crutch. Surely she has had access to 'experience' in Washington, over and above what Senator Obama has had. But USE of experience, not the raw quantity of it, is what concerns me in choosing another person to represent my interests. I will vote Democratic this election, both because McCain would be a pawn of dogma (i.e., Christian conservatism, BAD), and also because I believe Social Democracy is the direction in which industrialized societies gravitate. Although there may be some value to Hillary's 'riding the fence', Obama is more genuine, more independently minded, and more considerate of the issues that concern the majority of American citizens than Hillary. In my opinion. Obama has my vote. Not irrevocably, but repeatedly confirmed. This interview confirms once more.
mohanreddymutyala 03/18/2008 09:26 PM Report
who is the first citizen of the country
they will whole responsible for entir country.
Mary Elizabeth Nordstrom 02/20/2008 11:05 PM Report
Barack Obama's New Hampshire speech writer who got him to promise the day before the primary that he would reopen the paper mills is probably what upset the predicted New Hampshire vote, not Hillary's emotional moment. Long before we moved to North Carolina for 34 years, we lived in central New Hampshire that was plagued by the polluted Pemigewasset River that runs past where the paper mills flourished. New Hampshire Representatives to the General Court, as it was called, worked hard to get the rivers cleaned up so that paint would stay on the houses downwind of the river and the river itself can now contribute to the tourism industry. The latter is one of New Hampshire's largest industries that can be further developed. Not only can you keep the car windows open when driving along the Pemigewasset these days, you can enjoy the boating. Since the weather was all right on NH Primary day, probably everyone over 50 years of age who heard that speech in Rochester on TV made sure to get out and vote against him. We heard it in Maine although hidden in a laundry list of promises.
It is a LONG river and New Hampshire people have LONG memories.
Mary Elizabeth Nordstrom 02/20/2008 11:05 PM Report
Barack Obama's New Hampshire speech writer who got him to promise the day before the primary that he would reopen the paper mills is probably what upset the predicted New Hampshire vote, not Hillary's emotional moment. Long before we moved to North Carolina for 34 years, we lived in central New Hampshire that was plagued by the polluted Pemigewasset River that runs past where the paper mills flourished. New Hampshire Representatives to the General Court, as it was called, worked hard to get the rivers cleaned up so that paint would stay on the houses downwind of the river and the river itself can now contribute to the tourism industry. The latter is one of New Hampshire's largest industries that can be further developed. Not only can you keep the car windows open when driving along the Pemigewasset these days, you can enjoy the boating. Since the weather was all right on NH Primary day, probably everyone over 50 years of age who heard that speech in Rochester on TV made sure to get out and vote against him. We heard it in Maine although hidden in a laundry list of promises.
It is a LONG river and New Hampshire people have LONG memories.
Carrol Ann 02/11/2008 11:47 PM Report
Since when did the liar(s) get off Scott free and the lied to become the one(s) to be held accountable? For God's sake, all this Hillary bashing over her vote for the war. What about bashing the guy that lied to us in order to go to war and continued to lie to us nine-hundred and something times to keep us there! Hillary should not apologize, Bush and his cronies should be impeached. They lied, many of us believed. I am not apologizing because I believed. Eyes off Bush and eyes on Hillary! I say eyes on Bush and impeach the autocratic criminal.
ron thomas 02/06/2008 11:04 PM Report
This interview shows how tough this woman would be as President. She makes Bush look like a puffed up wimp (which he is anyway).
You are looking at the first woman President in the history of the U.S..... thank God (or the voters).
Ryan Gibbs 11/19/2007 06:08 PM Report
I can't disagree that I like Obama's message. It is truly refreshing...But that being said I think this country is still not at a point where racial ideologies won't have people on both sides of the isle voting against the color of someone's skin.
But if the democratic party puts out Edwards as the choice because they fear Hilary's baggage and though they won't say, they fear her gender, they will lose. Edwards is just beatable by Giuliani. And I am sorry but what the republican's represent in my mind is just bad business on all fronts. They couldn't manage Iraq properly, they couldn't manage the growth of the middle-class, they couldn't manage immigration. And what do we really have to show for 8 years of republican reign? There is going to have to be some hard choices made in the next 8 years and to me only Clinton has what it takes to do it. Iraq is far from over, Afghanistan is in need of more NATO, which means American, troops for security and to work that border with Pakistan, the Israeli/Palestine conflict has to be solved in some fashion, and there's 10 other fires from Pakistan to Russia that are ablaze. And the home-front is too with immigration, health care costs, the shrinking middle-class (and how it fits into a market-based economy), energy and resource issues, and the list goes on. Is the choice clear? Not even close. But I am just looking at it realistically.
Jim Beam 08/30/2007 04:10 AM Report
I wonder, since so many are in agreement that Hillary is too uptight to admit a mistake, if it really was a mistake, and not a reasonable conclusion based on crappy data, would Obama perhaps benefit from making a mistake, and then admitting it? Perhaps his problem is he hasn't made enough mistakes. That's why so many consider him to be inexperienced. Battle scars make you look distinguished. Character flaws are fashionable.
Joshua 08/01/2007 02:09 AM Report
Watching this clip convinces me even more that Hillary Clinton and her presidential candidacy represents more of the same kind of political maneuvering and pandering (to use Ryan's language) that is so typical of the Clintons. Her answers (and the way in which she neglects to answer some of Charlie's questions about her vote to authorize the Iraq war) reveals that she did not have the foresight to envision the many possible ways in which the war could implode (as is currently happening). She continues to blame Bush and his administration for not being forthright with the necessary and accurate intelligence before the war began. She can't admit that she was wrong. Being able to admit when you've made a mistake is something that I think every president (and person for that matter) needs to be able to do. Trying to sugarcoat a bad decision is arroganct and ignorant in my humble opinion.
Why is it that other people, who had the same exact intelligence, did not think that going to war was a good idea? Barack Obama is one of the few voices who opposed the war from the beginning:
http://my.barackobama.com/page/s/newleadership&source=SEM-rRegardless
Clinton not only panders to primary voters, but she panders to anyone who will give her money (think PACs and lobbyists here). I'm tired of politicians who seem to be stuck in the past and who find themselves caught in the middle of paying back corporate backers who finance their elections vs. representing the hardworking middle class voters who seek change on a variety of fronts (healthcare, education, jobs, etc.). Barack Obama truly represents change. He does not employ empty rhetoric that panders to voters or is uses it to get a cheap applause or sound bite. He understands the issues, is intelligent, charismatic, is not tied to PACs or lobbyists and their money and influence (e.g., Hillary never answers questions regarding who's donating to her campaigns), and he's exactly what the country needs right now. If Barack doesn't get the nomination, I'll vote for the Independent candidate--regardless of who he/she is. I would never waste my vote on Hillary--period.
Joshua
Ryan Gibbs 07/31/2007 12:28 AM Report
watching this makes you understand how Senator Clinton is truly above the other candidates on both sides of the aisle. Now whether that means she is just best trained to walk that middle ground is the kind of risks we take when we vote for, in the end, 2 candidates..But this is just a good insight to her from back in 2003..Mr. Rose needs to get her back on after the primaries if (almost when) she wins..She won't have to pander to primary voters anymore and we can see more of this women..