A discussion about the Jordanian Elections

with Zeid Bin Ra'ad and Efraim Halevy
in Current Affairs
on Thursday, January 24, 2013 * * * * *

E-mail this video:

Distribute this video:

Share on:

Close
Description

A discussion about Jordan's elections with Efraim Halevy, former director of Mossad and Prince Zeid Bin Ra'ad, Jordan’s ambassador to the United Nations

Video Share Options
Share
Buy Amazon DVD
Keywords:
elections
Ahmed Safadi
Netanyahu
politics
Muslim brotherhood
Jordan
Abbas
Israel
Syria
prime minister
King Abdullah
Obama
Palestinian
Al-Assaf

In order to download Charlie Rose podcasts to iTunes for transfer to an iPod, you must have iTunes installed. If you do, please click the following link to download the podcast for this interview:

itpc://www.charlierose.com/view/itunes/12751

Otherwise, close this window to continue viewing.

Close
  • Comments 2
    Post new comment
    1. SharkswithfrikingLazers  01/26/2013 02:38 AM Report

      Area - comparative:

      slightly smaller than Indiana

      National anthem:

      "As-salam al-malaki al-urdoni" (Long Live the King of Jordan)

      "Jordan's economy is among the smallest in the Middle East, with insufficient supplies of water, oil, and other natural resources, underlying the government's heavy reliance on foreign assistance."

      (Smaller than Indiana, Sing to the King, a welfare state per the CIA https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/jo.html. Prince Zeid Bin Ra'ad, Jordan’s ambassador to the United Nations, seems to have done quite well though.)

    2. REMant  01/25/2013 11:43 AM Report

      The Christian Science Monitor reported nothing like this. The Islamists were either excluded from or boycotted the election, and the govt engaged in vote-buying to boost turnout. Nearly 57 percent of registered voters voted, alright, but only 2.2 million of Jordan's 3.6 million eligible voters were registered. And it is not a system like ours with equal geographical representation.

      There's nothing inherently wrong with either monarchies or theocracies, but there is when they no longer reflect consensus. There's no way to divorce religion or political belief from society, as many of democracy's advocates would like to do. There's nothing positive about rights, or substantive in contract, only negativity and increasing alienation. Inalienable rights must also be inalienable duties. Virtue is not acquired in a vacuum, as Aristotle pointed out, but neither is a crowd a substitute for it. Too often a minority of those without any right are allowed by those who won't do their duty to wag the entire social animal, some of whom it appears received their comeuppance in this week's Israeli election.

      I cannot, however, pass on Mr Halevy's history of Palestine.