- Description
David Remnick of the New Yorker on Bruce Springsteen
In order to download Charlie Rose podcasts to iTunes for transfer to an iPod, you must have iTunes installed. If you do, please click the following link to download the podcast for this interview:
itpc://www.charlierose.com/view/itunes/12471
Otherwise, close this window to continue viewing.
Close
DavidRyan 12/04/2012 02:22 PM Report
I'd like to see ONE journalist write an honest profile of Springsteen and his music. No friends. No super-fans. No staff. No sycophants. No liars. Just ONE honest person. That's all I ask. I've been waiting for years. No one will do it. Write about his music honestly. Write about his lifestyle. Write about his personal failings (eg, affairs). So many cowards in the world. If Remnick has attended almost 60 of Springsteen's concerts, then he is a super-fan. How can he write an honest piece about him? He can't. I'm getting tired of the Springsteen-is-God myth. When is it going to be put to rest?
NeilMacCallister 08/07/2012 03:28 AM Report
My God!! .."58 appearances"??????
Is David Remnick Charlie Rose's "love child"?????
What has this young David ever added of enough importance to make his "daddy" proud??
That he loves Barack Obama as much as does Mr. Charlie????
Okay! ..But has either of these two men EVER explained WHY?????
blank 07/29/2012 09:19 PM Report
http://wtrns.fr/irfl7f37WNBlVY
http://i47.tinypic.com/33vgto6.png
okay i'm going to post this but i'm starting brand new in a different state of consciousness this i the only chance and possible way
hopefully i'll come out in some other and things will be working better
tabs 07/27/2012 01:35 PM Report
Now comes part three:
"I could have written "Satisfaction" but you could never have written "Like A Rolling Stone." Dylan to Jagger
Mr Remnick as a sagious chronicler of culture at the New Yorker leaves something to be desired. It is doubtfull that Mr Remnick has ever come down from his lofty New York tower to ever to touch the ground. As such he doesn't have the verve of expressing nor understanding the zeitgeist.
tabs 07/27/2012 12:51 PM Report
Now comes part two:
"The little twerp thinks he is Lucifer." Ry Cooder on Mick Jagger.
The Rolling Stones starting at the end of 67 produced some of the most scintillating Rock and Roll ever put on record. The end of 67 ushered in a darker more on edge epoch of their career that was a reflection of their run ins with the law over drugs and the psychological disintegration of Brian Jones. And the Stones music showed it from "Jumping Jack Flash" "Stray Cat Blues" "Sympathy for the Devil", "Gimme Shelter" "Midnight Rambler" to "Monkey Man" there was juxtaposition of being able to cross the line from sanity into madness and back again at will. Nothing more than the live version of "Sympathy For The Devil" on their "Get Yer YA YA's Out" album shows this dichotomy more clearly, then the juxtaposition of Mick Taylors crisp guitar playing against Richards signature howl from hell riffing all against the struting and growling Mick Jagger playing Lucifer.
tabs 07/27/2012 11:52 AM Report
The Rolling Stones devolved from being artists into being entertainers after Altamont. Before Altamont the Stones thought of themselves as being cultural outlaws on the cutting edge of society. Then at Altamont they met some real outlaws in the Hells Angels which as Keith Richards states in his autobiograpy was "the end of the dream." or perhaps delusion.
tabs 07/27/2012 11:20 AM Report
American Society promulgates the use of violence as a means of resolving ones problems. At the core of the Liberals abdication of moral responsibility is their blaming inanimate objects for this malaise instead of dealing with the core causality. To the Liberal mind it is as if an inanimate object supercedes an indivduals responsibility as it has control over the actions men take. Further passing more Gun Laws serves as political theater rather than a useful recourse in solving the core issue of violence. This in the end is just more Liberal delusional thinking, hypocrisy and or just plain being disingenuous.
blank 07/26/2012 11:02 PM Report
i have to get a new fork but i was testing out the seat position early morning on sunday and i was in the cross walk at a standstill (literally not moving) with a lot of cars stopped there and i guess my chain broke i didn't realize it so i went to go suddenly to make the crosswalk and i flipped over onto the bars and over and crashed everywhere pretty seriously i'm all scraped up both arms and hands i bashed my knee and scraped it all up it's all sore too i bounced along the pavement in the street after hitting the ground and got all tangled with the bike on me too i punctured my hand there was blood all on my clothes and seat then after making it to the side of the street i got really light headed suddenly (?) lost balanced and was out (not actually unconscious more like lightheaded loss of vision and what direction is up and down) on the side of the street for about five minutes
blank 07/26/2012 11:01 PM Report
http://www.london2012.com/cycling-track/schedule-and-results/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RZJ4ESU52U&feature=related
okay check this the current situation is what is there's no indication that anything is going to be different in the future (me) i'm just going to try the best i can and see where i am
life is what it is
(i'm sort of letting myself fall apart)