In order to download Charlie Rose podcasts to iTunes for transfer to an iPod, you must have iTunes installed. If you do, please click the following link to download the podcast for this interview:
itpc://www.charlierose.com/view/itunes/11224
Otherwise, close this window to continue viewing.
Close
Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1
danono 11/18/2010 10:18 AM Report
http://http://www.findsoso.com/
Our website wholesale for many kinds of fashion clothing, such
as nike,jordan,prama,****, we also sell jeans,shirts,bags,hat and
many kinds of tiffany. All the products are free shipping, and the
the price is enticement , and also can accept the paypal
payment.we can ship within 24 hours after your payment.
accept the paypal
free shipping
competitive price
any size available
Everything is here http://www.findsoso.com friends, please
enjoy viewing bar
Thanks
hanhan0 11/15/2010 06:13 AM Report
Thanksgiving Day will soon come round . will you want to go on a huge shoppoing ? and you will get a free gift if you order more .
welcome to: http://www.fashionsports.org
The website wholesale for many kinds of fashion shoes, like the
nike,jordan,prada, also including the je ans,shirts,bags,hat and the
decorations. All the products are free shipping, and the the price is
competitive, and also can accept the paypal payment.,after the payment,
can ship within short time.
free shipping
competitive price
any size available
accept the paypal
http://www.fashionsports.org
SOCCER JERSEY 16USD
jordan shoes $32
nike s h o x $32
Christan Audigier bikini $23
Ed Hardy Bikini $23
Smful short_t-shirt_woman $15
ed hardy short_tank_woman $16
Sandal $32
christian louboutin $80
Sunglass $15
COACH_Necklace $27
handbag $33
AF tank woman $17
puma slipper woman $30
http://www.fashionsports.org
Cyn 11/09/2010 08:05 PM Report
Strategic issues: In the last six months Chinese neighbors have felt China turn in to a neighborhood bully. For example, Japan, India, and Vietnam have felt China pushing them around on various issues. Sure, China has issues of its own but its strategic ambitions are not exactly what Tung would have you believe. Some of their leaders talk about Confucius a little too often for me to believe them. And that scares me about their ambitions. Thankfully, the US is helping Taiwan and South Korea quite vigorously to make sure the balance stays while doing major deals with India as well. Naturally, China is not very happy about it and is, for example, keeping India busy with Pakistan, Maoists, border and trade issues among others. It certainly is not going to let India become a permanent member of the Security Council any time soon.
Economy: I am sure people at the US Treasury are smart enough to understand the computer analogy and believe there is plenty of room for the Chinese to let their currency float. Sure, China would like to see its people do better but once you are a partner, you better start acting like one.
Nuclear policy and leadership around the world: I do not believe Tung one bit. He was not very sure about his answers Iran, for instance. Ultimately, he was trying to escape out of the situation. Good job, Charlie.
Perhaps making the US leadership feel more comfortable about China is Tung's style, but I am inclined to believe Lee Kuan-Yew's views more. For instance, he was quite straightforward in suggesting to the US leadership to get the hell out of Iraq/Afghanistan and get its economy back on track. Tung, to me, was more "diplomatic" in his answers. He was trying to project China as a country that has no way of competing the US (which it is, but not as much as he is trying to project) by patronizing its leadership (many such examples during the interview). And I think the US leadership has understood this tendency of the Chinese leaders and that is why one hears more calls for "action."
Pattisan 10/06/2010 06:22 PM Report
If what he said was true about a $700 computer and what China REALLY gets...then where is this big trade deficit?????? If they get less than 100 where is the other 600? I like this man and feel he is an honest broker. He is one of the few I trust in their gov't.
lindarden07 10/05/2010 01:18 AM Report
Whenever drugs come from columbia, nobody ever asks "why Americans want to buy them?"
krispietreats 10/03/2010 06:38 PM Report
Whenever the Chinese ask why we sell arms to Taiwan, nobody ever asks them "Why do they want to buy them?"
SaveDolphins 10/03/2010 09:39 AM Report
I agree wholeheartedly with waywalkinginlove. Today, money is like rain. Sometimes there is a flood and sometimes there is a drought. It is up to us people to use our intelligence, instead of letting games of chance rule us. We should realize that the world of the remote past had a much smaller population, and was a very archaic world. We should envision a future world with healthy innovative populations, not just a small tricky elite.
lindarden07 10/02/2010 10:42 AM Report
I think the fundamental issue between US and China is whether US will allow another power to emerge. In a layman's word, do you want to see your neighbor to become more and more prosperous and your wealth stays the same the whole time.
The world order has to be changed if China becomes a big power in the world. The world resources have to be shared with all the sudden another 1.6 billion people. I don't know whether average western citizen and every politician in the west will agree to that.
Regarding the currency, it seems keeping domestic currency valuation low is the norm everywhere. Just a few days ago, Japanese government intervened with Yan market, to appreciate their currency? No, to keep the value low. (sorry for the typo.) China is just singled out in this case.
For Nuclear, sanction doesn't work that well. China has been sanctioned for decades before it developed its nuclear power. Then, all the sudden everyone becomes more friendly to China. The world is very real. Power speaks. Iranian understands that. Plus, US posts a constant threat to overthrow the current Iranian government. Nuclear is the mean to deter US's potential for invasion.
dorjezhonnu 10/01/2010 09:01 PM Report
I think as consumers we certainly have a right to ask how our good are being made. Is it equitable? Are the workers treated well? Last year, Foxconn was a great example where there were so many labour issues even "accidents". I want to know if I buy toys for my kids does it contain lead or has prison labor been used for it? These are fair questions. Transparency will let me decide as an informed consumer whether to buy or not. Opacity is not a good policy and accusing others of interfering with internal affairs ring hallow. The fact these were glossed over meant the American people are not being served well.
Me thinks thou proteth much :)
JohnGelles 10/01/2010 07:46 PM Report
There are internal issues, such as the racial composition of our jail population and our people born in poverty, that China does not raise because they are seen as internal.
If anyone is to raise questions on the border line between global peace and global perfection, it ought to be our President not our TV pundits.
I would have raised the the issues of global finance accomplished outside domestic budgets. Here Charlie could have asked his guest what he thought of QUANTITATIVE EASING to replace selling Treasury bonds to China. TV pundits have a limited range of questions. But this one is grounded in what Bernanke does in small measure. If we did it in truly large measure, we would be pointing to a global transformation away from debt-based money to output-based money. China is doing well in output. The idea is not an insult to them in any measure. Yet, if Tung Chee-hwa had a positive opinion on moving away from debt toward growth in trade for, say inflation protected cash, we might have solved the current currency disputes in the blink of an eye. We might have unleashed productivity growth that really meant win-win to all nations--no matter what they paid their own people at the moment.
Think of guaranteed middle class incomes and jobs for all Americans. How else can we do that if debt constrains our plans?
JMA 10/01/2010 09:12 AM Report
Pity Charlie did not raise the issue of Tibet with the man.
JohnGelles 09/30/2010 05:58 PM Report
Tung Chee-hwa and Jack Ma present the Chinese mind and spirit that renew our faith in the human race. That faith prevailed -- in spite of the reign of terror and evil that nearly destroyed freedom and common sense in necessary wars and unnecessary defeats in parliaments of human political and economic rights.
Charlie Rose gets my thanks for showing us these leaders and articulating their importance to the future on every competent mind.
The three men, Tung, Jack and Charlie, are in my view, representative of the best we have among molders of opinion and educators of their peers. Yet they did not address the key question of the last two thousand years: What is money, and how do we discover and employ it the way we have discovered electricity and employed it?
You may reject the notion that money is like electricity. You may think it is more like gold.
You are wrong if you think that way. My problem and yours is to explain that money is really "price" -- and it is nothing like gold.
In other words, because discovering gold in the quantities necessary (to motivate our minds to connect full employment to doable democratic budget systems,)is not possible. There is not that much gold.
But there is that much electricity, skill, sweat, courage and money to do it.
Why would Americans, whose liberty was secured with continentals (in the Revolution) and greenbacks (in the Civil War) and quantitative easing (QE) in WW II, not know what money is today -- when they need so much of it ?
I think we much admit that the reason is the same as the reason all other nations fail to know these facts today.
It is not a conspiracy of crooked lawyers, accountants, bankers, academics, bankers and politicians. It is no more than an accident of history. If democracy lasts, the ignorance that hurts today will have disappeared: just the way debtors prisons and slavery, as they were, are gone.
Charlie and our Chinese allies said everything we need to hear. Yet they said nothing to solve the problem of jobs NOW. They said nothing that would justify our Constitution (where money is adequately covered)-- they assumed there is an "intelligent market" with an all-knowing mind of its own. They did this innocently and ignorantly. Yet, their body language claimed they were the best, brightest and most decent people there are. They assumed their own competence. Yet that are not.
waywalkinginlove 09/30/2010 02:43 PM Report
What a man!
Gustav 09/30/2010 12:32 PM Report
For the past 2 years i've been spending about 40% of my time in China, when I don't live in Sweden.
I gained many friends, western friends and chinese friends.
Billionaires, mayors, club and restaurant owners. Many powerful and succesful chinese people.
I don't know how long time it took me to understand how difficult it would be for a western company to open up business in China...
Before I went to China I imagined a country filled with ambitious people that think like us in the west and are beeing very succesful. But I was wrong. Most people don't speak English at all, they dont know anything about foreign politics nor economics. And I do mean foreign, not just western, people might not even know who kim jong il is(!)
My general idea is that China is being China, like it always has. Of course cultures have clashed and we've both learnt from eachother, but it doesn't show that much...
But the interview with Jack Ma earlier made me more interested in China than I've been for a long time! Hopefully more individuals like that will show themselves.
end rant
REMant 09/30/2010 12:09 PM Report
I don't see how the exchange rate question has much to do with the differences between China and America, except that as I think he implied, it points up our laziness and Chinese industriousness. He is also right that economic flows are rarely just between two countries. British mercantilists in this situation tried to embargo gold outflows to India a couple centuries ago, and had to have it pointed out that it would kill their exports to the countries India bought from. If the Chinese work harder, then it behooves its competition to match them, not complain about it. That is what free trade is about, and anything else will not only be suboptimal, it will further the problem. All this talk about fear of deflation, is just a cover for laziness and condescension. The question of fear of China is a red herring going back to the "Red Scare" beginning in the mid 19th c, tho it is actually much older. It does not in my view have much to do with opposition to tyranny, as is often alleged, but the perpetuation of feudal attitudes, both of the nobility and of the church, where charity is too often a matter of self-aggrandizement. Not to put too fine a point on it, we are a much lazier, selfish, and hypocritical ppl than we suppose.