In order to download Charlie Rose podcasts to iTunes for transfer to an iPod, you must have iTunes installed. If you do, please click the following link to download the podcast for this interview:
itpc://www.charlierose.com/view/itunes/11015
Otherwise, close this window to continue viewing.
Close
Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1
futurevisionaries 04/22/2011 08:24 PM Report
Jeffery ,
Can you help or know of people or companies that can help?
I need to save global FUTURE brands for and by the global people and countries.
My name is Kent G Anderson .
I see where 12 years of my life's work and ideas can help all people in all countries. My goal is to share the global Brand FUTURE... Future is design like a country and people's ideas are the global product. For more information about me and global people FUTURE google Kent G Anderson. My web page is www.futurevisionaries.com .
FUTURE sm/tm
925 N Griffin
Bismarck,ND
58501
USA
milmntec@btinet.net
dmiller 06/08/2010 06:50 PM Report
Every industry comes up with new ways to differentiate new product from the old. It doesn't mean that the old product is bad or lesser in any way, nor the new product suddenly has answered the last question or become the final solution. Piracy is really hurting the industry. There are few industries that could survive their products being pirated as the entertainment industry has and if they can come up with a way to make the viewing experience more interesting, more special than what the people ripping their products can do - more power to them. It's not a sign of poor health; it's a sign of resilient thinking to transform their industry. Why would you trash the studios when neither the courts nor non-paying consumers are willing to live up to their responsibility?
REMant 05/18/2010 03:00 PM Report
IMHO, what the world thinks of Avatar doesn't really matter either. Art is art not because it is expressive (whatever that is), but because in the process of doing or communicating it things are discovered, the same as in science or law. When that doesn't happen it is bad, whether it makes money or not. But, if, as you say, 3/4s of the 139 movies will not be worth seeing, it will most likely be because, like Avatar, they really say nothing. And, of course, it is possible to make uninformative movies for a lot less than we do, just as it is possible to make money without making ppl destitute. BTW, I've been told the Spanish "El secreto de sus ojos" aka "The Secret in Their Eyes" (2009) is very good.
Majic 05/18/2010 01:16 PM Report
Hi,
Considering his great career and credentials this is ambitious for me to say, but like Ebert I disagree with Mr. Katzenberg’s belief in 3D as the future of the movies. It is mainly pursued because the industry needs 3D to justify a price premium to replace the price premium of faltering DVD sales. They don't better movies, and are in fact a indication of the movie industry's poor health.
I wrote a long article further explaining why called "In the Footsteps of GM". Available at: https://sites.google.com/site/footstepsofgm/article
I think there’s some value in it, its topic is a new vertical integration as a solution for the industry, so to anyone reading it thanks and I hope you enjoy.