The Developing Brain

with Patricia Kuhl, Stephen Warren, Eric Kandel, Huda Zoghbi and Elizabeth Spelke
in Science & Health part of Charlie Rose: The Brain Series
on Tuesday, February 23, 2010 * * * * *

E-mail this video:

Distribute this video:

Share on:

Close
Description

On episode five of the Charlie Rose Brain Series, a discussion of the developing brain with Patricia Kuhl of University of Washington, Elizabeth Spelke of Harvard University, Stephen Warren of Emory University, and Huda Zoghbi of the Baylor College of Medicine and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Co-hosted by Eric Kandel of Columbia University and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute

Watch previous episodes here

Video Share Options
Share
Buy Amazon DVD
Keywords:
eyes
brain
children
health
science
Development
Kandel
vision
Seeing
perception

In order to download Charlie Rose podcasts to iTunes for transfer to an iPod, you must have iTunes installed. If you do, please click the following link to download the podcast for this interview:

itpc://www.charlierose.com/view/itunes/10877

Otherwise, close this window to continue viewing.

Close
  • Comments 10
    Post new comment
    1. JbRoche  12/10/2010 12:14 PM Report

      With an emphasis on considering the aspect of Dr Kulh's 'kids in the television condition have learned nothing' revelation - in an attempt to add importance to this - i've written a piece that would amount to 'philosophy' for some viewers. This is obviously a subject that is not everyone's cup of tea. If nothing else then this is my way of saying thank you Charlie for providing such gripping entertainment. http://twmgtto.blogspot.com/

    2. T_Grant  11/15/2010 02:34 PM Report

      Before Piaget published his theories, he was the president of the Swiss MONTESSORI Society, and his first observations of children were made in a MONTESSORI school.

      Dr. Maria Montessori had already anticipated stages and sensitive periods for learning. She had worked with Hugo de Vries on this subject.

      Erik Erikson also was trained in Montessori, and according to her father, Anna Freud was a Montessori "disciple."

      Dr. Montessori also wrote about embryology, and truly deserves some attribution for her work... as she came BEFORE those who stood on her shoulders.

    3. marionu  09/22/2010 05:10 PM Report

      From birth till seven years babys have an inhanced abillty to learn languge, then a decline in that abillity. At two mo. till two years babys have a larger number of synapsis.

      These factors plus, heredity,and other influances account for this abillity.

    4. BillMarston  08/28/2010 04:28 AM Report

      c824767 wrotek in part: "...kids can get quite confused by multiple languages especially if the languages are very similar to each other. like french and italian.

      unless the child is very gifted and has a special knack for languages"

      (hmm. interesting already in the difficulty I had in typing above who it was that I quoted - because it was a string of numbers and not a "word" or a "name". ... ah, well... GRIN)

      "Gifted" in language just means that those synapses remain functional after the initial language absorption phase. But WHY!!? I am one of those who do, although I am not an actor nor a mimic nor a party clown. I just can and have always been able to (since having the luck to study a foreign language in American public school at age 11 along with some 30 - 70 others for introductory program in 7th grade, in 1959; and then Russian experimentally for a summer between 10-11th grades - with only a Wollensak tape recorder as our teacher - well, OK workbooks of alphabet, thenwords, then sentences but 80% was LISTENING / REPEATING with sound-isolating headphones). It worked superbly well at least for me, and I have not spoken with the other 17 or so in decades... moved by this I will try to contact some of them to compare experiences - success in ear & tongue, though without use, of course, no growth or staying power of grammar, declension, vocabulary, etc.

    5. c824767  06/07/2010 11:05 AM Report

      so kids can take in multiple languages up until the age of 7. then the ability declines and kids can get quite confused by multiple languages especially if the languages are very similar to each other. like french and italian.

      unless the child is very gifted and has a special knack for languages

    6. laurat  02/28/2010 02:31 PM Report

      episode 5 transcript page 3 the discussion is about Rett Syndrome. I have some experience with a friend with Rett Syndrome. Rett Syndrome (RTT) is the "Rosetta Stone" of neurological disorders. Research on RTT will bring us closer to answers for Schizophrenia, Autism, Alzheimers. To learn more about RTT go to www.rettsyndrome.org the international rett syndrome foundation is fantastic site. Thank you for this excellent program. I will continue to watch. Laura

    7. NonaFamous  02/25/2010 06:16 PM Report

      This 5th episode on the brain is the first I've seen. This topic on language ability is precisely what my University foreign language methods students and I are taking up now.

      Thank you for this cutting edge presentation.

    8. jagal  02/25/2010 10:28 AM Report

      That was absolutely amazing program. I have not seen previous episodes yet, but I'm sure I will.

      One question occured to me regarding to language learning process - are there more or less difficult languages for babies to learn? Analyzing what all guests talked I think there is no difference for child which language he learns.

    9. ShalomFreedman  02/25/2010 02:14 AM Report

      This was another extremely interesting program in this 'Series'. As a layman I take pleasure in learning certain basic bits of knowledge and ideas which filter through the discussion. A baby coos and then at eighteen months babbles and then a year has a word and at two years two words together and then at three can speak whole sentences. The idea that different aspects of intelligence develop at different times and rates , also expressed by Patricia Kuhl is perhaps a cliche for researchers but for the layman a bit of revelation. Above all perhaps the sense that there is now a whole approach by which one no longer relies simply on theoretical discussion and argument but rather uses and creates experiments which make use of the technologies that show areas of brain- activity is central to all this.

      I would however put in one small caveat. Elizabeth Spelke was informative and interesting throughout. I especially liked her last comment regarding her wish to know about how humans attain abstract thinking. But her ideas on brain- development convergence of men and women are controversial.And I was surprised none of the other panelists even raised a question about this. It seems to me there is a lot of evidence which in fact proves the exact opposite of what she claims. This failure to pick this up made me consider all the programs in this series so far. They are all very collegial, with everyone seeming to be agreeing with everyone else. It seems to me there is something not so alright in this, though it makes for pleasant television. Conflicting approaches and controversy are too part not only of humanistic dialogue but of scientific work. Perhaps however in consideration of the non- professional character of the audience Charlie Rose and Eric Kandel organized for a 'you don't get in my space and I won't get in yours' discussion.

    10. Goodquestion  02/24/2010 04:29 PM Report

      Very interesting show. I hope you touch on hormones and the aging brain in the next show on "the aging brain". The link between hormones and human health seems to be lagging in the research world.

      Thank you.