- Description
Oscar Nominations with A.O. Scott of The New York Times, Stephanie Zacharek of Salon.com, Dana Stevens of Slate and Annette Insdorf, Director of Undergraduate Film Studies at Columbia University
In order to download Charlie Rose podcasts to iTunes for transfer to an iPod, you must have iTunes installed. If you do, please click the following link to download the podcast for this interview:
itpc://www.charlierose.com/view/itunes/10845
Otherwise, close this window to continue viewing.
Close
Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1
hpmoon 03/01/2010 02:08 PM Report
Kind of a cheap jab at the Second City at the very end from both Scott and Rose, who both regularly sneer at the so-called "heartland" (and I have no relationship with Chicago or the "heartland" in any way, writing from Washington). It was so Manhattanite, in the worst and most predictable way, so as to effectively moot out the preceding observations as merely the exchanges of an insular community.
doodahdaze 02/04/2010 06:39 PM Report
And of clear mind. :)
doodahdaze 02/04/2010 06:36 PM Report
Good to see you're still healthy and strong, TABS. ;)
REMant 02/03/2010 11:53 AM Report
Figures they are all flicks I have no interest in seeing. The usual suspects, tho. Nothing controversial to be found. I'm sure they'll pick the black or the woman as director for reasons apart from their work. Hopefully they'll choose decent performances, instead of giving out awards for seniority, but in my mind there isn't a lot to select from. They might tap Bullock and Bridges, but I doubt I would. Better than Streep and Clooney, I guess. Supporting statuettes seem mostly to be given to encourage noobs or as consolation prizes, but in recent years they've segmented the market so much nearly no one is left out. I suppose the bomb squad or the 3D sci-fi extravaganza will be best pic, in the interest of pandering to public opinion in these lean times. Count me out. And forget the ceremony, too.