Daily Highlights Wednesday July 29, 2009

with Janet Napolitano, Bill Frist and Howard Dean
in Science & Health, Current Affairs
on Wednesday, July 29, 2009 * * * * *

Sorry, this video isn’t available at the moment; please check back soon.

play

E-mail this video:

Distribute this video:

Share on:

Close
Description

Daily Highlights Wednesday July 29, 2009 with Janet Napolitano; Howard Dean, Bill Frist

[Watch full episode} (http://www.charlierose.com/schedule/?date=2009/7/29)

Video Share Options
Share
Keywords:

In order to download Charlie Rose podcasts to iTunes for transfer to an iPod, you must have iTunes installed. If you do, please click the following link to download the podcast for this interview:

itpc://www.charlierose.com/view/itunes/10528

Otherwise, close this window to continue viewing.

Close
  • Comments 1
    Post new comment
    1. tartufe  08/07/2009 01:08 PM Report

      An insurgent worth his salt will find other ways. If this selective editing continues, I will flood all 'open' active (red) sites with this comment to the point you will have to filter me out by my email address. You have an obligation with a public forum and if you can't sustain it then succumb to the JEWISHforces that be and shut down. That in itself will be a message worth disseminating.

      NEW (8/7/09) BUT PREDICTABLE DEVELOPMENT: MY ANTI FUNNY PEOPLE MOVIE COMMENTS HAVE ALL BEEN DELETED! HIT A RAW NERVE DID I? CAN’T HANDLE THE TRUTH? PROVE ME WRONG. WHAT’S DISCOURSE ALL ABOUT? As stated below, the legitimacy of this forum will be (has been) impugned if(as) this comment is(was) deleted, and the power of Jewish influence validated. Charlie opened this Pandora’s box. He needs to live with it. But he can’t take his own medicine, open discourse. The NY Jews have him by the gonads (balls to Sandler fans), which makes him impotent as far as an honest dialogue broker. One more once:

      Movie: Funny People, w/Adam Sandler, Judd Apatow Director 7/31/09

      SAVE YOUR MONEY!

      This is an intentional OFF-TOPIC comment. Charlie intentionally kept it from the ‘View full schedule’ list apparently to minimize commentary by letting it rotate to history. That in itself says it must have some topical potency to it and all the more reason to be open for comments. Otherwise get out of the business. This movie was an assault on (my) social mores, and I want to launch an asymmetrical counter insurgency in return, atopical or not.

      Three recurring themes throughout the movie: 1. Obsessive use of fuck word, 2. Obsession with penises, testicles (balls in the vernacular) and male genitalia generally and 3. Constant reminders of Jews and Jewishness. If a vagina was mentioned it was drowned out about sucking and rubbing penises together or even parental male genitalia. Arrested development at say a third grade level to be generous. Classy stuff. Homophiles personified.

      On Jews and Jewishness? Well a concerted effort was made to let you know that all major players were Jewish. Seemingly obsessively so. The movies tedium gives you time to reflect. What is it that makes Jews persistently stand out, despite their minority status. They’re prominent in finance, comedy, arts, entertainment, science (the bomb). Yet at the same time they have a history of being reviled. Is there a connection? Psychological? Introspection overdue? Does their insularity, begin with their expulsion from Egypt, to conflicts with Rome, to pogroms in Russia, Eastern Europe, to the Holocaust? Does it provide a historical callous toughness that propels them to excel? And in the ways of ‘avengers?’ Sounds like a case study for a Jewish scholar.

      For example, to punish the west for their indifference for ‘allowing’ the Holocaust, they (unconsciously?) insidiously attack their values, financial and moral. Financial? Were it possible to repeat history from say 1990 sans Jews the financial collapse may well not have happened. Moral? Attack old established societal norms, like certain obscenities: fuck, shit, piss, fart, sucking penises, licking balls, on and on ad nauseam. Destroy elegance. Promote coarseness, crassness. The stereotypical brassy Jew syndrome?

      Jewish attacks on values in 2009 alone (cherry picked to make the point): Israeli state terrorism on Palestinians (killing 1300, 400 children with phosphorous shells), Hasidic Jews in Brooklyn molesting male adolescents, in New Jersey harvesting kidneys from the disadvantaged for $10,000 and selling them in Israel for $160,000 and Rabbis on the take; Tel Aviv gunman shoots up gay party, to name only the ones that made the news. Charming! Classy! And corrosive!

      If it’s unfashionable to be anti-Jewish or (gasp, choke) anti-Semitic (even tho that’s a confused term that includes Arabs), it would be helpful if they themselves would not make it so easy. Even inevitable.

      Adam Sandler and Judd Apatow did not help the Jewish cause, nor their own, with this movie. Nor did Charlie by touting it (or his own cause). His values need an overhauling as well.

      SAVE YOUR (FUCKING) MONEY! Stay home and repeat fuck at the rate of 500 times per minute, a few mother-fucks as a tokenism to blacks (which the movie obligingly included - as in equal opportunity crassness) and you’ll have it.

      To Charlie’s monitors, the legitimacy of this forum will be impugned if this comment is deleted, and the power of Jewish influence validated. Charlie opened this Pandora’s box. He needs to live with it.