GUEST
KEYWORD
Search
Charlie Rose Science Series
Click here to watch previous episodes of the Charlie Rose Science Series


Charlie's Choice
Hot, Flat, and Crowded: Why We Need a Green Revolution--and How It Can Renew America
by Thomas L. Friedman
Buy it
Find Charlie in Your Area
Click here to check your local listings.
gdfgds
Charlie Responds (FAQ)
Submit your questions for Charlie and read Charlie Responds (FAQ) for the answers
A conversation with the former U.K. ambassador to the United Nations
11/12/2007
Jeremy Greenstock
A conversation with the former U.K. ambassador to the United Nations
Keywords:
Buy  Share
A conversation with the former U.K. ambassador to the United Nations and former special envoy to Iraq, Sir Jeremy Greenstock.
Comments
Comment by TABS on Thursday, May 15 at 06:41 AM

The threat that Terrorism poses is not in the event itself but the reaction of the financial markets to that event. A major event in an American city could cause a run on the bank causing a crisis of liquidity which would then melt down the system. That is what nearly every nation in the world recognized after 911. That is why Al Qaeda poses such a threat to the status Que. That is also why the USA has to respond swiftly and surely militarily to reassure the world that the status Que is still viable.
Sending Report...
Abuse Reported
Comment by Pierre on Wednesday, May 14 at 11:03 PM

Another brilliant and distinguish guy who did not saw the obvious when it was time to see it. If I understand well he was part of the unlucky for whom the reality did not deign to fit their fantasies. Sorry but the cost in human lives is to high just to say: Well, it is to bad but we should have done it in another way. And making an hypothetical projection of what would have gone wrong if they had not done it, as an excuse to escape the blame.
Sending Report...
Abuse Reported
Comment by Pierre on Wednesday, May 14 at 11:02 PM

Another brilliant and distinguish guy who did not saw the obvious when it was time to see it. If I understand well he was part of the unlucky for whom the reality did not deign to fit their fantasies. Sorry but the cost in human lives is to high just to say: Well, it is to bad but we should have done it in another way. And making an hypothetical projection of what would have go wrong if they had not done it, as an excuse to escape the blame.
Sending Report...
Abuse Reported
Comment by Harrison on Thursday, Nov 15 at 09:26 PM

Thank you Mr Rose, for your interview with Sir Jeremy, I agree that diplomacy in the Middle East is far more constructive than war. His comment on America's refusal to talk with Iran before the invasion and still today, exemplifies the administrations arrogance which sadly seems so childish.
Sending Report...
Abuse Reported
Comment by Cookie on Thursday, Nov 15 at 04:40 PM

At first I thought this was a depressing conversation, but then I saw the humorous side. Here is a guy saying the UK has to stand up to the US after the fact, and the French - who stood up to the US when it counted - get a smooch from the US President. That's gotta be hurting Downing Street. Those cheese eating surrender monkees win again!
Sending Report...
Abuse Reported
Comment by Louie on Tuesday, Nov 13 at 02:08 AM

Mr. Rose I found Mr. Eskanders interview the SANEST words to date concerning Iraq. I would implore you to use what pull you have to forward his message. Sincerely L R
Sending Report...
Abuse Reported
Comment by dismayed on Tuesday, Nov 13 at 12:57 AM

It is hoped that the Administration was watching to hear the realization that our power has reduced relative the rise of others: China, India, Brazil. We may have to resort to being good neighbors yet. <<p>> How painful if we had to go all the way to humility. This is a dangerous outlook for the M-I complex. It will be interesting to see how they will overcome that. Iran will have to be exploited to the utmost. How subtle will their 'arrangement' of the politicians be to achieve their goals? Wonder what the generally accepted accounting principle is for reporting this expense?
Sending Report...
Abuse Reported
Comment by Cookie on Monday, Nov 12 at 07:43 PM

In a post here that was subsequently deleted, I refered to Greenstock as an "old smoothie". Apparenlty this caused offense and was removed. I find it rather humorous as Greenstock came on Charlie's show spreading the most utter nonsense during the buildup to the war and has since come out to admit he didnt actually believe all he was saying. In that light, calling him an "old smoothie" seems rather tame.
Sending Report...
Abuse Reported
Comment by Cookie on Monday, Nov 12 at 07:43 PM

In a post here that was subsequently deleted, I refered to Greenstock as an "old smoothie". Apparenlty this caused offense and was removed. I find it rather humorous as Greenstock came on Charlie's show spreading the most utter nonsense during the buildup to the war and has since come out to admit he didnt actually believe all he was saying. In that light, calling him an "old smoothie" seems rather tame.
Sending Report...
Abuse Reported
 
Leave Your Comment
 Name (required)
 Mail (will not be published) (required)
Your Comment (required):
Submit Comment
Related Videos
Associated Media